Commissioner Of Income Tax,Madurai v. M/S.glorious Evangelical Ministriesno
High Court
22 Aug 2014 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax,Madurai v. M/S.glorious Evangelical Ministriesno
Date of order
22 Aug 2014
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax,Madurai v. M/S.glorious Evangelical Ministriesno, the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Issue: Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case,the Tribunal was right in law in directing the Commissioner ofIncome TGax to grant registration under Section 12AA eventhough the genuineness of the Trust and the charitableactivities have not been established with documentaryevidences?" 2.
Decision: In view of the above-said submission, following thedecision of this Court in T.C.(A)No.579 of 2013 dated 27.01.2014,this Tax Case (Appeal) stands dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
In the High Court of Judicature at Madras
Dated: 22.08.2014
Coram
The Honourable Mr.JUSTICE R.SUDHAKARandThe Honourable Mr.JUSTICE G.M.AKBAR ALI
Tax Case (Appeal) No.261 of 2014
Commissioner of Income Tax,Madurai...Appellant/Respondent Vs.
M/s.Glorious Evangelical MinistriesNo.63, Telegraph Office Road,Tuticorin 628 002..Respondent/Appellant
APPEAL under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act against theorder dated 11.7.2011 made in I.T.A.No.616/Mds/2011 against theorder of the Commissioner of Income Tax-I, 2,V. P.Rathinasamy NadarRoad, Bibikulam,Madurai-625 002 dated 01.02.2011 and made inC.No.464/98/2010-11/CIT-I in PAN.No. . on the file of theIncome Tax Appellate Tribunal 'A' Bench, Chennai for the assessmentyear 2010-2011.For Appellant : Mr.M.Swaminathan Standing counsel for Income TaxJ U D G M E N T(Delivered by R.SUDHAKAR,J.)
This Tax Case (Appeal) is filed by the Revenue as against theorder of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal raising the followingsubstantial questions of law:
"1. Whether on the facts and in the circumstancesof the case, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was rightin holding that registration under Section 12AA can begranted to the trust with both charitable and religiousobjects on application of section 11(1)(a)?
2. Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case,the Tribunal was right in law in directing the Commissioner ofIncome TGax to grant registration under Section 12AA eventhough the genuineness of the Trust and the charitableactivities have not been established with documentaryevidences?"
2. Learned counsel appearing for the Revenue fairly submitsthat the issue involved in this appeal is covered by a decision ofthis Court in T.C.(A)No.579 of 2013 dated 27.01.2014, wherein thisCourt, following the decision of this Court reported in (2012) 206https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/Taxman 69 (CIT V. Arulmighu Sri Kamatchi Amman Trust), dismissedthe appeal filed by the Revenue holding that the Revenue would not
be justified in refusing the grant of registration at thethreshold..
3. In view of the above-said submission, following thedecision of this Court in T.C.(A)No.579 of 2013 dated 27.01.2014,this Tax Case (Appeal) stands dismissed. The question of law isanswered against the revenue. No costs.
Sd/-Asst. Registrar(CO) Dt.03/09/14
/true copy/Sub Asst. Registrar.slTo1.The Assistant Registrar, The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal 'A' Bench, Chennai III Floor,Rajaji Bhavan,Besant nagar,Chennai-902. The Commissioner of Income Tax -I, Madurai.2,V.P.Rathnasamy Nadar Road,Bibikulam,Madurai-625 002.UG(CO)ka 15/09Tax Case (Appeal) No.261 of 2014
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.