Case LawHigh Court › Commissioner Of Income Taxmadurai v. Sai...

Commissioner Of Income Taxmadurai v. Sainulaptheen Katheeja Umma

High Court 22 Sep 2025 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Taxmadurai v. Sainulaptheen Katheeja Umma
Date of order
22 Sep 2025
Assessment year(s)
2015-16
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income Taxmadurai v. Sainulaptheen Katheeja Umma, the High Court (2025) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: In that view of the matter, the appeal stands dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

TCA No.404 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 22.09.2025 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA,CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN TCA No.404 of 2023 Commissioner of Income TaxMadurai. .. Appellant -vs- Sainulaptheen Katheeja Umma .. Respondent Prayer: Appeal filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against the order dated 15.02.2023 passed in ITA No.264/Chny/2022 on the file of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras “B” Bench, Chennai, for the Assessment Year 2015-16. For Appellant :Mr.V.MahalingamSenior Standing Counselfor Mr.M.Swaminathan For Respondent :Mr.T.Vasudevan Page 1 of 4 JUDGMENT(Delivered by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) TCA No.404 of 2023 Heard learned counsel for the appellant/Revenue. Mr.Vasudevan, learned counsel, appears for the respondent/Assessee. 2. At the outset, learned counsel for the Revenue fairly submits that it is a case having low tax effect. Therefore, in view of the Circular No.05/2024 dated 15.03.2024 and Circular No.09/2024, dated 17.09.2024, issued by the Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, Central Board of Direct Taxes, Government of India, the appellant/Revenue does not wish to proceed with the matter, though the question of law may be kept open for consideration in the appropriate matter. In that view of the matter, the appeal stands dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. (MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CJ.) (G.ARUL MURUGAN, J.) 22.09.2025 Index: Yes/NoNeutral Citation: Yes/Nosra Page 2 of 4 To 1. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras 'B' Bench, Chennai. Madras 'B' Bench, Chennai. 2. The Commissioner of Income Tax, Madurai. Madurai. Page 3 of 4 TCA No.404 of 2023 Page 4 of 4 TCA No.404 of 2023 THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICEAND G.ARUL MURUGAN, J. (sra) TCA No.404 of 2023 22.09.2025
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan