Case LawHigh Court › Commissioner Of Income Taxsalem v. P.sen...

Commissioner Of Income Taxsalem v. P.sengottaiyan

High Court 22 Nov 2024 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Taxsalem v. P.sengottaiyan
Date of order
22 Nov 2024
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income Taxsalem v. P.sengottaiyan, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Recording the aforesaid submission, these tax case appeals are dismissed as withdrawn leaving the question of law open to be decided in an appropriate matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

T.C.A.Nos.658, 659 & 660 of 2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 22.11.2024 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICEANITA SUMANTHandTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G. ARUL MURUGAN T.C.A.Nos. 658, 659 & 660 of 2009 Commissioner of Income TaxSalem... Appellantin all TCAs vs P.Sengottaiyan Prop : Barath Sago FactorySarvoy Post, Attur. .. Respondentin all TCAs Prayer in TCA No.658 of 2009 : Appeal filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras 'D' Bench, dated 08.08.2006 in ITA No.643/Mds/2005. Prayer in TCA No.659 of 2009 : Appeal filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras 'D' Bench, dated 08.08.2006 in ITA No.642/Mds/2005. Prayer in TCA No.660 of 2009 : Appeal filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras 'D' Bench, dated 08.08.2006 in ITA No.644/Mds/2005. For Appellant :Mr.Karthik RanganathanSenior Standing Counsel (in all TCAs) For Respondent:Died (Steps Due) DR. ANITA SUMANTH.,J.andG. ARUL MURUGAN.,J. COMMON JUDGMENT(Delivered by Dr. ANITA SUMANTH.,J) Mr.Karthik Ranganathan, learned Senior Standing Counsel, appearing for the appellant/Department would submit that the Income-Tax Department does not wish to pursue these appeals qua assessment years 1994 - 95 (in TCA No.658/09), 1996 - 97 (in TCA No.659/09) and 1995 - 96 (in TCA No.660/09) and seek withdrawal of the same on account of the low tax effect per Circular bearing No.9 of 2024 dated 17.09.2024. 2. Recording the aforesaid submission, these tax case appeals are dismissed as withdrawn leaving the question of law open to be decided in an appropriate matter. No costs. Index:Yes/NoNeutral Citation:Yesssm T.C.A.Nos. 658, 659 & 660 of 2009
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan