Commissioner Of Income Taxtamil Nadu-Viii, Chennai v. M/S.international Services,Harbour Gage House,44-45, Rajaji Salai, Chennai 600 001

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 29.1.2016 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDRENANDTHE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.VIMALA Tax Case Appeal No.1406 of 2009 Commissioner of Income TaxTamil Nadu-VIII, Chennai.... Appellant/Appellant Versus M/s.International Services,Harbour Gage House,44-45, Rajaji Salai, Chennai 600 001.PAN No.AAAF10229E... Respondent/Respondent Prayer: Appeal presented to the High Court against the order ofthe Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Madras `B' Bench, dated7.8.2009, in I.T.A.No.2002/Mds/2008 against the Order of theCommissioner of Income Tax(Appeals) IX, Chennai made inITA.No.140/07-08 dated 14.07.2008 against the Order of theAdditional Commissioner of Income Tax, Business Range - VIII,Chennai 6, PAN No.AAAF10229E, dated 05.12.2007. For Appellant : Mr.T.Ravikumar Mr.T.R.Senthil Kumar Mr.J.Narayanaswamy Mr.M.Swaminathan For Respondent : Mr.S.Sridhar The learned counsels appearing for the Appellant/Revenue hadsubmitted that they may be permitted by this Court to withdrawthe present tax case appeal, in view of the Circular No.21 of2015, issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes, Department ofRevenue, Ministry of Finance, Government of India, dated10.12.2015, as the tax effect relating to the matter is lessthan Rs.20,00,000/-. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2. The learned counsels had further submitted that libertymay be granted to the Appellant/Revenue to revive the tax caseappeal, if it is found that it had been withdrawn,inadvertently, even though it falls under the exceptionsmentioned in paragraph 8 of the circular. 3. In view of the said submissions made by the learnedcounsels appearing for the Appellant/Revenue, the present taxcase appeal stands dismissed, as withdrawn. It is made clearthat the questions of law, which may arise for the decision ofthis Court, in the present tax case appeal, are left open to beconsidered and decided in appropriate cases, in accordance withlaw. It is also made clear that it would be open to theAppellant/Revenue to revive the tax case appeal, if it is foundthat it had been withdrawn, inadvertently, even though it fallsunder the exceptions mentioned in paragraph 8 of the Circular,within a period of twelve weeks from today. No costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar ssk. //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar To: 1.The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Madras 'B' Bench, Chennai. 2.The Commissioner of Income Tax, (Appeals) IX, Chennai. 3.The Additional Commissioner of Income Tax, Business Range VIII, Chennai 06. Business Range VIII, Chennai 06. VGI(CO)CA(23/02/2016)