Commissioner Of Income Taxtrichy I, Trichy v. G.ranganathan
High Court
12 Dec 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Taxtrichy I, Trichy v. G.ranganathan
Date of order
12 Dec 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Taxtrichy I, Trichy v. G.ranganathan, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In the instant case, the tax effect is said to be lessthan the monetary limit imposed and therefore, the appeal filedby the Revenue is dismissed as not pressed, keeping open thesubstantial questions of law for determination in an appropriatecase.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 12.12.2018
THE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARIANDTHE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH
Commissioner of Income TaxTrichy I, Trichy.
..Appellant/ Respondent
Vs.
G.Ranganathan
..Respondent/ Appellant
Tax Case Appeal filed under Section 260A of the Income TaxAct, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax AppellateTribunal, Chennai 'A' Bench dated 22.8.2008 in ITANo.697/Mds/2006. Against the order of the Commissioner of IncomeTax-I, Tiruchirappalli, dated:03/02/2006 made in C.No.6143(4)CIT-1/TRY/2005-06, and
Against the Assessment order Passed by the DeputyCommissioner of Income Tax Company Circle -I, Trichy, dated10/12/2003, made in G.I.R.No.PAN.12-PR-196/ .For Appellant : Ms.Premalatha For Mr.M.Swaminathan Senior Standing Counsel
This Tax Case Appeal has been filed by the Revenue callingin question the correctness of the order passed by the IncomeTax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai 'A' Bench dated 22.8.2008 inITA No.697/Mds/2006, by raising the following substantialquestion of law:
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
"Whether on the facts and in the circumstancesof the case, the Appellate Tribunal was right inholding that the Commissioner of Income Tax was notjustified in invoking the jurisdiction underSection 263 on the ground that the Assessing Officerhas failed to make proper enquiries in certainaspects in the assessment and quashing the orderunder Section 263 for that reason?"
2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learnedStanding Counsel brought to our notice the Circular instructionissued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes vide CircularNo.3/2018 dated 11.7.2018 wherein it is stipulated that appealsshall not be filed/pursued by the Department before the HighCourt in cases where the tax effect does not exceed Rs.50 lakhs.
3. In the instant case, the tax effect is said to be lessthan the monetary limit imposed and therefore, the appeal filedby the Revenue is dismissed as not pressed, keeping open thesubstantial questions of law for determination in an appropriatecase.
Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS VIII) //True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
To
1.The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal,Chennai 'A' Bench, Chennai
2.The Commissioner of Income Tax-I,Tiruchirappalli.
3.The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax,Company circle-I, Trichy.
+1cc to Mr.V.S.Jayakumar, Advocate, S.R.No.86053
EV(CO)GSP(04/01/2019)
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.