In Commissioner Of Income Taxvs Bhopal School Of Social Science v. Rajendra Menon)Judge, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Shrinivas Education Societyby a common order passed on 02.04.2013, for the grounds andreasons indicated in the said order as the question formulated forconsideration in this appeal has already been answered, we seeno reason to make indulgence into the matter.Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
ITA-1-2010
( COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXVs BHOPAL SCHOOL OF SOCIAL SCIENCE)
05-04-2016
Shri Sanjay Lal, learned counsel for the appellant.
Even though office has indicated that there is some delay in filingof this appeal but on going through the averments made in I.A.No.2807/2016 filed by the Revenue, we find that there is no delayin filing and the appeal has been filed in time.Accordingly, office objection with regard to delay is rejected.
Challenging the orders passed by the Income Tax AppellateTribunal this appeal has been filed by the Revenue under Section260-A of the Income Tax Act. The question of law framed in thiscase has been answered against the Revenue by a Co-ordinateBench of this Court in I.T.A. No.14/2011 � Commissioner ofIncome Tax Vs. Devi Sakuntala Thakral Charitable Foundation,I.T.A. No.4/2012 � Commissioner of Income Tax vs. BhopalCampion School Society, I.T.A. No.5/2012 � Commissioner ofIncome Tax Vs. Shri Satya Sai Trust, I.T.A. No.6/2012 �Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. M/s. Shrinivas Education Societyby a common order passed on 02.04.2013, for the grounds andreasons indicated in the said order as the question formulated forconsideration in this appeal has already been answered, we seeno reason to make indulgence into the matter.Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.
(RAJENDRA MENON)JUDGE
(SUSHIL KUMAR PALO)JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.