Commissioner Of Incometax-(Exemptions v. Society For Participatoryresearch In Asia
High Court
08 Aug 2017 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Commissioner Of Incometax-(Exemptions v. Society For Participatoryresearch In Asia
Date of order
08 Aug 2017
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Incometax-(Exemptions v. Society For Participatoryresearch In Asia, the High Court (2017) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
$~35
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ITA 611/2017
COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX-(EXEMPTIONS)
..... Appellant
Through:Mr. Zoheb Hossain, Senior StandingCounsel.
versus
SOCIETY FOR PARTICIPATORYRESEARCH IN ASIA
Through:None.
..... Respondent
CORAM:
JUSTICE S. MURALIDHARJUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH
O R D E R08.08.2017
%
1. This appeal has been filed by the Revenue under Section 260A of theIncome Tax Act, 1961 (‘Act’) against the order dated 17[th]February, 2017passedbytheIncomeTaxAppellateTribunal(‘ITAT’)inITANo.1553/Del/2015 for the Assessment Year (‘AY’) 2010-11. In theimpugned order, the ITAT has placed reliance on its own order passed forAY 2009-10. Further, in the impugned order, the ITAT has noted that theissues involved in the said appeal were squarely covered in favour of theAssessee while relying upon the earlier decision of the ITAT which has beenupheld by this Court in ITA No. 845/2016 by its order dated 25[th]November,2016. In the said order dated 25[th]November, 2016 this Court reiterated itsearlier decision in India Trade Promotion Organisation v. DirectorGeneral of Income Tax (2015) 371 ITR 333.
2. Learned Senior Standing Counsel states that the Revenue has preferred anappeal against the judgment of this Court in India Trade PromotionOrganisation v. Director General of Income Tax (supra) and that leave hasbeen granted by the Supreme Court by its order dated 14[th]July, 2017. Aperusal of the said order shows that there is no stay of the judgment.
3. In the considered opinion of this Court, no substantial question of lawarises from the impugned order of the ITAT.
4. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed.
S. MURALIDHAR, J.
AUGUST 08, 2017dk
PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.