Commissioner Of Incometax (International Taxation And Transfer Pricing v. M V Clipper Lasco, Mv Siam Opal And M V Vostok
High Court
16 Jul 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
Commissioner Of Incometax (International Taxation And Transfer Pricing v. M V Clipper Lasco, Mv Siam Opal And M V Vostok
Date of order
16 Jul 2018
Assessment year(s)
2011-12
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Incometax (International Taxation And Transfer Pricing v. M V Clipper Lasco, Mv Siam Opal And M V Vostok, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Present Tax Appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn with the above liberty.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/TAX APPEAL NO. 512 of 2018
======================================
COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION AND TRANSFER PRICING)Versus
M V CLIPPER LASCO, MV SIAM OPAL AND M V VOSTOK
======================================
Appearance:
MR.VARUN K.PATEL(3802) for the APPELLANT(s) No. 1for the RESPONDENT(s) No. 1
======================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.R. SHAHandHONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.Y. KOGJE
Date : 16/07/2018ORAL ORDER (PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.R. SHAH)
1.Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned order passed by the learned Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Rajkot Bench, Rajkot (hereinafter referred to as “the learned Tribunal”) dated 31/08/2017 in ITA No.284/RJT/2013 for the Assessment Year 2011-12, revenue has preferred the present Tax Appeal.
2.At the outset, it is required to be noted that the tax effect in the present Tax Appeal is less than Rs.50 lacs, and therefore, considering the recent Circular issued by the CBDT dated 11/07/2018, being Circular No.3/2018, present Tax Appeal is not required to be entertained. Under the circumstances, Shri Patel, learned advocate appearing on behalf of the revenue seeks permission to withdraw the
present Tax Appeal, however, has requested to reserve the liberty in favour of the appellant to revive the Appeal in case any further directions are issued by the CBDT clarifying Circular No.3/2018. Permission is accordingly granted. Present Tax Appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn with the above liberty.
(M.R. SHAH, J.)
(A.Y. KOGJE, J.)
siji
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.