Case Law › High Court › Commissioner Of Incometax v. Apco Worldw...

Commissioner Of Incometax v. Apco Worldwide (India) Pvt. Ltd

High Court 31 Jul 2018 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · dhcdb

Parties

Date of order

31 Jul 2018

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Incometax v. Apco Worldwide (India) Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2018) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Recording the aforesaid, the appeal is disposed of, without answering the substantial question of law, which is left open.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

$~55 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ITA 813/2018 COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Ashok Manchanda, Senior Standing Counsel versus APCO WORLDWIDE (INDIA) PVT. LTD Through ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR O R D E R% 31.07.2018 CM No.30406/2018 Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. CM No.30405/2018 Delay in re-filling the appeal is condoned. Application is allowed. ITA No.813/2018 Learned Senior Standing Counsel for the revenue states that in the present appeal, the tax effect is below Rs.50,00,000/-, and in view of circular No.3/2018, dated 11.7.2018, the substantial question of law raised need not be answered and may be left open. Recording the aforesaid, the appeal is disposed of, without answering the substantial question of law, which is left open. SANJIV KHANNA, J JULY 31, 2018 tp CHANDER SHEKHAR, J

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.