Case Law › High Court › Commissioner Of Jncometax, Patiala v. Yo...

Commissioner Of Jncometax, Patiala v. Young Scholar3S$ Educationa

High Court 08 May 2024 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · phhc

Parties

Date of order

08 May 2024

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Jncometax, Patiala v. Young Scholar3S$ Educationa, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal.

Decision: SANJEEVPRAKASH SHARMA, J.| The appeal is dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURTAT CHANDIGARH Reserved on18.04.2024Pronounced onO8 05.2024 ITA No. 94 of 2011 (O&M) The Commissioner of Income-Tax, Patiala VeTSUS Baba Banda Singh Bahadur Education Trust, Fatehgarh Sahib ... Appella ... Responde CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA|HON’ BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA! Present:Mr. Amanpreet Singh (A.P.), Senior Standing Counsel,for the appellant. Mr. Pankaj Jain, Senior Advocate assisted byMr. Divya Suri, and Mr. Sachin Bhardwaj, Advocates,for the respondent. SANJEEVPRAKASH SHARMA, J.| The appeal is dismissed. For orders, see details reasons| recorded in a separate order of even date passed in ITA No. 21 of 2011 —The Commissioner of JncomeTax, Patiala vs Young Scholar3S$ Educationa Society, Barnala. (SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA)JUDGE 08.05.2024 VS (SUDEEPTI SHARMA)JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.