Commissioner Of Lncome Tax-Vl, Lncome Tax Department, Hyderabad v. Prasad

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY ,THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF JUNETWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYANANDTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL NO: 319 OF 2006 (lncome Tax Tribunal Appeal Under Section 260-4 of the lncome Tax Act, 1961against the order of the lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench 'A',Hyderabad in ITA No.'10021Hyd12003, for Assessment Year 1999-2000, dated 31-01-2006, preferred against the Order of the Commissioner of lncome Tax (Appeals)-VlHyderabad, in Appeal No.0246M.9(3yClT(A)-Vl/2002-03 dated 20-06-2003,against the order of the lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench 'A',Hyderabad in ITA No.'10021Hyd12003, for Assessment Year 1999-2000, dated 31-01-2006, preferred against the Order of the Commissioner of lncome Tax (Appeals)-VlHyderabad, in Appeal No.0246M.9(3yClT(A)-Vl/2002-03 dated 20-06-2003,preferred against the Order of the lncome Tax Officer (OSD) Range-9, Hyderabad,PAN/GlR No.M-308 dated 26-03-2002.)PAN/GlR No.M-308 dated 26-03-2002.) Between: M.Narasimha Reddy & CO, (Firm), 1B-124, Hyderabad. ...APPELLANT AND Commissioner Of lncome Tax-Vl, lncome Tax Department, Hyderabad. ...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Appellant: None appeared. Counsel for the Respondent: Mr. J. V. PRASAD, S.C. FOR INCOME TAX DEPT. The Court made the following JUDGMENT THE HON'BLD THE CHIEF JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYANAND THE HON'BLE SRi.TUSTICE N. TUKARAMJI LT.T.A. Irlo.319 of 2006 JUDGMENT: (['er tltt l{rtrr lL],itt i'hief JLtstrce Ulial Bhu-L1art1 None appezrrs for thc appellant on call though Mr. J.V.Przrsad. lt'atnerl Standing Counsel, lncome ToiD('Dartnror)t lor thc r-esporrricnt i:; present l.r rc-lc r 2. On O r-.(Xr.201.-i. rrc had passed the fcllou,ing "Norrr: trppt'rrr-s Irr rlrc appcllarlt on call thorrghlr4r'. J.V.l'rasad, lc:arn,rrl Sr:t:tdirrg Counscl. Incomc TaxI)opartm(nt for rh(' rcsp()n.i('Dt is present. VJr llrrrl Lhat r rrrlr('r also there \,\,as norcprcsent.lLion on bchail r,l rlrt: appcllant. ln Ll.r:tL vrc.rr of []t( [,itirucr, ]lisr the appeal under thecaptiorr ['fc,r ]drsnrrssal' r,l I 1 06.2023 shou,ing the namc ofI\tl r. .1.\'.Pr.asacl. lcirlni:ci I irun:icl lor the rcspondent." 3. 3. Sincc thclL. ts rio r'(.1) rc sen tzrtion on bchaif of thcappellant, thr: appcirl is clrs;missed for non-prosecutionIloteve r, tlrerc sherll bc no or-clcr as to costs. !-i("J &, .\l',tt,I1.7.1 ..\. No..3 1 9 c:J )0O(t 4. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, 1f any. in this appeai shall stand closed. Sd/-B.S.CHIRANJEEVIJOINT REGISTRARr_1DSECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY// To,1. The lncome Tax Appellate [Tribunal, ][Hyderabad Bench ][' ][A ', ][Hyderabad(with]record, if any)1. The lncome Tax Appellate [Tribunal, ][Hyderabad Bench ][' ][A ', ][Hyderabad(with]record, if any) 2. The Commissioner of lncome [Tax (Appeals)-Vl ][Hyderabad,] 3. The Income Tax Officer [(OSD) Range-9, ][Hyderabad] 4. One CC to [\rlr. J. V. PRASAD, [S.C. ] [dept ]TOPUC] 5. Two CD Copies \'y DL 9?'x11// HIGH COURT DATED:14l06/2023 JUDGMENTITTA.No.319 of 2006 DISMISSING THE APPEAI-FOR NON-PROSECIJTION >.:a:::':::-').,1'.1-':1<i.t__lt'l[tut?m]\ [(-\]).r1..