Case LawHigh Court › Commissioner Ofincome Tax-1, Chandigarh...

Commissioner Ofincome Tax-1, Chandigarh v. Shri Sukhwant Singh

High Court 02 Mar 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Commissioner Ofincome Tax-1, Chandigarh v. Shri Sukhwant Singh
Date of order
02 Mar 2020
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Commissioner Ofincome Tax-1, Chandigarh v. Shri Sukhwant Singh, the High Court (2020) decided the matter.

Decision: Shri Sukhwant Singh passed in ITA No.283 of 2019, decided on 20.02.2020. © In the circumstances, the petition stands disposed of in theSame terms as 1nITA No.283 of 2019.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA|AT CHANDIGARH ITA No.289 of 2019 (O&M)Date of Decision : 02.03.2020 Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-1, Chandigarh ...... Appellant VerTSU M/s Punjab Information & Communication TechnologyCorporation Ltd., ...... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICEKE AJAY TEWARIHON'BLE MR. JUSTICAVNEESH JHINGAN --- Present ;Mr. Yogesh Putney, Sr. Standing Counselfor the appellant. --- AJAY TEWARI, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the appellant states that the facts of thepresent case are covered by the decision of this Court in the matter of.Pr, Commissioner ofIncome Tax-1, Chandigarh Vs. Shri Sukhwant Singh passed in ITA No.283 of 2019, decided on 20.02.2020. © In the circumstances, the petition stands disposed of in theSame terms as 1nITA No.283 of 2019. Since the main case has been decided, the pending civilmiscellaneous application, if any, also stands disposed of. (AJAY TEWARI )JUDGE 02.03.2020pooja sharma-l ( AVNEESH JHINGAN)JUDGE Whether speaking/reasonedWhether Reportable | Yes/NoYes/No
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan