Case Law › High Court › Commissioner v. Sterling Auxiliaries Pvt...

Commissioner v. Sterling Auxiliaries Pvt. Limited

High Court 20 Mar 2018 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · gujarathc

Parties

Date of order

20 Mar 2018

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Commissioner v. Sterling Auxiliaries Pvt. Limited, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

C/TAXAP/147/2018 ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD F/TAX APPEAL NO. 147 of 2018 With F/TAX APPEAL NO. 193 of 2018With F/TAX APPEAL NO. 205 of 2018With F/TAX APPEAL NO. 230 of 2018With F/TAX APPEAL NO. 233 of 2018With F/TAX APPEAL NO. 234 of 2018With F/TAX APPEAL NO. 241 of 2018With F/TAX APPEAL NO. 242 of 2018With F/TAX APPEAL NO. 243 of 2018With F/TAX APPEAL NO. 271 of 2018With F/TAX APPEAL NO. 272 of 2018With F/TAX APPEAL NO. 288 of 2018With F/TAX APPEAL NO. 293 of 2018With F/TAX APPEAL NO. 298 of 2018With F/TAX APPEAL NO. 299 of 2018With F/TAX APPEAL NO. 8872 of 2018 ========================================================== COMMISSIONER,VersusSTERLING AUXILIARIES PVT. LIMITED ========================================================== Appearance: MR NIRZAR S DESAI(2117) for the PETITIONER(s) No. 1 ========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHIandHONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.N. KARIA C/TAXAP/147/2018 ORDER Date : 26/03/2018 ORAL ORDER (PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI) Office objections shall be removed on or before 9.4.2018, failing which, the matters shall stand dismissed for want of prosecution, without reference to the Court. (AKIL KURESHI, J) raghu (B.N. KARIA, J)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.