Case Law › High Court › Commissionerofincometax Ludhiana v. Mls...

Commissionerofincometax Ludhiana v. Mls Tridentalco Chem Limited

High Court 14 Oct 2011 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · phhc

Parties

Date of order

14 Oct 2011

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Commissionerofincometax Ludhiana v. Mls Tridentalco Chem Limited, the High Court (2011) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

944 IN THE HIGH COURTOFPUNJAB AND HARYANAATCHANDIGARH Dateof Decisionl 14 0201 1 ITA No53 of2004 CommissionerofIncomeTax Ludhiana Versus Mls TridentAlco Chem Limited Respondent CORAM1HONBLEMRe JUSTICE HEMANTGUPTAHONBLEMRJUSTICE GSSANDHAWALIAHONBLEMRJUSTICE GSSANDHAWALIA 1HONBLEMRJUSTICE GSSANDHAWALIAPresentMrRohitKatoch Advocateforappellant0Ms [Radhika]Suri Advocatefor respondent0IHEMANTGUPTAJ0ForIorders[see]ITA No53 of 2003 titled[as] CommissionerofIncomeTax Ludhiana[vs] Mls Varinder tlero ChemicalsLimitedZHEMANTGUPTAIJUDGEJrIr142011ZpreetlmmaoZx[4J]eC01KUMAR SURESHJOYTI RANISHAM LAL2016.03.28 15:57d2012.10.31 12: 18True ScannedI attest to the accuracy andCopy of Theintegrity of this documentOriginalPHHC,Chandigarh

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.