Committee Golden Forest India Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax And Anr
High Court
24 Apr 2017 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Committee Golden Forest India Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax And Anr
Date of order
24 Apr 2017
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Committee Golden Forest India Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax And Anr, the High Court (2017) decided the matter.
Decision: The petition is disposed of.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
$~
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
18
+ W.P.(C) 2574/2016 & CM 10948/2016
COMMITTEE GOLDEN FOREST INDIA LTD ..... Petitioner Through: Ms Suruchi Aggarwal, Advocate Through: Ms Suruchi Aggarwal, Advocate
versus
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANR
..... Respondent
Through: Ms Urvashi Duggal, Senior Standing Counsel
CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR
%
O R D E R24.04.2017
1. The only question sought to be urged in this writ petition is whether the Petitioner, Committee - Golden Forest India Ltd., can be treated as an Assessee for the purposes of income tax liability qua the company i.e., Golden Forest India Limited to decide the question of assessment in respect of large number of assessment years (‘AYs’).
2. Learned counsel for the Respondents pointed out that the assessment orders have been passed and the appeals being now filed by the Petitioner against those assessment orders are pending before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) (‘CIT(A)’). Accordingly, the Court permits the Petitioner to raise the above question of law before the CIT(A) if the same has already not been raised. It will be open to the Petitioner to urge the contentions in regard thereto before the CIT(A) and thereafter, if need be.
3. Till the time the Petitioner files an application before the CIT(A) for stay of the demand, provided that the said application be filed not later than two weeks from today, the interim order passed by this Court on 1[st] April, 2016 will continue till such time the CIT(A) disposes of such application in accordance with law.
4. The petition is disposed of. The pending CM 10948/2016 is also disposed of.
S.MURALIDHAR, J
APRIL 24, 2017 rd
CHANDER SHEKHAR, J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.