Conc/1441/2019 Of Gurmit Singh Vilkhu v. O.p.yadav Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax 1

Signature Not Verified SAN 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH,CHIEF JUSTICE & HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV ON THE 15[th] OF MARCH, 2022 CONTEMPT PETITION CIVIL No. 1441 of 2019 Between:- GURMIT SINGH VILKHU S/O LATE SARDARGIAN SINGH, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, R/O H.NO1615, VIJAY NAGAR CHAPER, RAMPUR,JABALPUR (M.P.) 482008 PRESENTLY RESIDINGAT C/O B.L.YADAV, PLOT NO. 389/A, PAWANBHUMI, SAINIK SOCIETY ROAD, SHAKTINAGAR, MADAN MAHAL, JABALPUR (M.P.) - 482001. MOBILE NO.- , .....PETITIONER (PETITIONER IN PERSON) AND1.O.P.YADAV, PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX-1, AYAKAR BHAWAN, C.R.BUILDING, NAPIER TOWN, JABALPUR (M.P.)482001 2.MAHENDRA SHUKLA, INCOME TAX OFFICERJABALPUR WARD NO. 1 (1), JABALPUR,AAYAKAR BHAWAN, ANNEXIE BUILDING,JABALPUR (M.P.) 482001 .....RESPONDENTS (BY SHRI SANJAY LAL - ADVOCATE) This petition coming on for admission this day, Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravi Malimath, Chief Justice passed the following: ORDER This petition has been filed on the ground that the order dated 14.02.2019 passed in Writ Petition No.9494 of 2017 has been disobeyed. Signature Not VerifiedSAN Reply has been filed by the respondents along with the calculations madeand payments have been given to the petitioner directly into his account. However, what is being contended by the party in person is that theamount that the petitioner is entitled to has not been paid by the respondents.That the calculations made by them are not correct. According to him, he isentitled to a higher amount than what has been paid. However, on considering the arguments of the party in person, we are ofthe view that such contentions cannot be raised in a proceeding for contempt.The contempt proceeding would be concerned only when there is a wilfuldisobedience. There does not appear to be any wilful disobedience. Hence, wefind no good ground to proceed further in the matter. However, liberty isalways reserved to the party in person to make out his case with regard to hisentitlement, if any, in an appropriate proceeding. The petition is, accordingly, disposed off. (RAVI MALIMATH)CHIEF JUSTICE (PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV)JUDGE pp