Case Law › High Court › Const. Attorney, Rahim Mehboobvirani v....

Const. Attorney, Rahim Mehboobvirani v. Income Tax Officer And 2 Ors

High Court 07 Oct 2019 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · hcbgoa

Parties

Date of order

07 Oct 2019

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Const. Attorney, Rahim Mehboobvirani v. Income Tax Officer And 2 Ors, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

1 WP 786 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOAWRIT PETITION NO. 786 OF 2019 IQBAL ISMAIL VIRANI, THR. HIS CONST. ATTORNEY, RAHIM MEHBOOBVIRANI Versus INCOME TAX OFFICER AND 2 ORS. ... Petitioner ... Respondents Mr. J. Supekar, Advocate for the petitioner. Coram:- C. V. BHADANG &NUTAN D. SARDESSAI, JJ.Date:- 7th October, 2019 P.C.: Mr. J. Supekar, learned Advocate for the petitioner states that thepetitioner has deposited the total amount of ₹1 crore as directed by thisCourt by order dated 09/09/2019 in two installments of ₹50 lakhs eachwhich have been paid on 09/09/2019 and 28/09/2019. He furthersubmits that the ITAT after hearing the petitioner has granted stay ofthe impugned order passed by the Income Tax Officer(Intl. Taxation,Panaji). 2. In that view of the matter, the learned Counsel for the petitioner,on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the petition. The petition isaccordingly disposed of as withdrawn, with no order as to costs. NUTAN D. SARDESSAI, J. mv C. V. BHADANG, J.

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.