Consulting Engineering Services (India) Pvt. Ltd v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, & Ors

$44 & 45 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+W.P.(C) 4340/2015CONSULTING ENGINEERING SERVICES (INDIA) PVT. LTD. .....Petitioner ThroughMr Saul Kapoor with Mr Sanat Kapoor,Mr Vikas Jain and Mr Shubharn Rastogi,Advocates.Mr Vikas Jain and Mr Shubharn Rastogi,Advocates.versus ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX & ORS. Respondent ThroughMr Rohit Madan with Mr Ruchir Bhatia,Advocates. / W.P.(C) 4341/2015 + CONSULTING ENGINEERING SERVICES (INDIA) PVT. LTD. 4 .....Petitioner ThroughMr Saul Kapoor with Mr Sanat Kapoor,Mr Vikas Jain and Mr Shubham Rastogi,Advocates.Mr Vikas Jain and Mr Shubham Rastogi,Advocates. versus • ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, & ORS. .....Respondent ThroughMr Rohit Madan with Mr Ruchir Bhatia,Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMEDHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVAORDER%06.05.2015 CM Nos.7859/2015 (exemption) in WP(C) 4340/2015CM Nos.786112015 (exemption) in WP(C) 4341/2015 Exemptions are allowed subject to all just exceptions. WP(C) 4340/2015 & CM No.7860/2015 (stay) WP(C) 4341/2015 & CM No.7862/2015 (stay) In both the writ petitions, the petitioner has received Section 148 Signing Date:20.09.2024 17:11:41Certify that the digital and physical file havebeen compared and the digital data is as perthe physical file and no page is missing. notices from two different Income Tax Officers. The learned counsel forrespondent/Revenue has taken instructions. A letter addressed to MrMadan by ACIT, Circle 30(1), New Delhi has been placed before us. Theletter is dated 30.04.20 15 and the same is taken on record. As per the saidletter, the notices issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961had been inadvertently issued to the petitioner by ACIT, Circle 30(1), NewDelhi. It is further stated that the said notices issued by the said IncomeTax Officers are being withdrawn. Those notices pertain to AssessmentYear 2008-09 and 2009-10, which are the subject matter of the present writpetitions. In view of the said letter, the position stands clarified. Thepetitioner has to respond to the notice under Section 148 issued by theAssessing Officer at Circle 4(1), New Delhi. The writ petitions stand disposed of accordingly. ^7^-BXDARAHMED, J MAY 06, 2015St SANJ EV SACHDEVA, J