Case LawHigh Court › Cont P/1107/2018 Of K. Inbasagaran v. Mr...

Cont P/1107/2018 Of K. Inbasagaran v. Mr.umesh Kumar Barnwal, Income Tax Officer, Corporate Ward 6(3), Chennai-34

High Court 20 Nov 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Cont P/1107/2018 Of K. Inbasagaran v. Mr.umesh Kumar Barnwal, Income Tax Officer, Corporate Ward 6(3), Chennai-34
Date of order
20 Nov 2020
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Cont P/1107/2018 Of K. Inbasagaran v. Mr.umesh Kumar Barnwal, Income Tax Officer, Corporate Ward 6(3), Chennai-34, the High Court (2020) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

In the High Court of Judicature at Madras Dated : 20.11.2020 Coram : The Honourable Mr.Justice T.S.SIVAGNANAM Cont.P.No.1107 of 2018K.Inbasagaran...PetitionerVsMr.Umesh Kumar Barnwal,Income Tax Officer, CorporateWard 6(3), Chennai-34....RespondentPETITION under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act to punish the respondent for willful disobeying the order dated 13.7.2017 passed in W.P.No.35234 of 2016.For Petitioner : Ms.D.KalaiselviFor Respondent :Mr.A.P.Srinivas, SSC ORDER I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Senior Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent. 2. This contempt petition has been filed alleging willful disobedience of the order and directions issued in W.P.No.35234 of 2016 dated 13.7.2017. 3. Mr.A.P.Srinivas, learned Senior Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent submits that the Department filed a writ appeal in W.A. No.1183 of 2018 against the order in the said writ petition and that the Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court, while confirming substantial portion of the order in the said writ petition, issued certain modified directions to the Department by judgment dated 03.2.2020. 4. In the light of the above subsequent development, this contempt petition is closed making it open to the parties to agitate their rights in terms of the said judgment of the Hon'ble Division Bench dated 03.2.2020 in W.A.No.1183 of 2018. SD/- rs ASSISTANT REGISTRAR(COMM.CASES) //Certified to be true copy// Dated at Madras this the day of 2021. COURT OFFICER(O.S.) from 25[th] day of September 2008 the Registry is issuing Certified copies of the Orders/Judgments/Decrees in this format.SMI/11/01/2021 To The Income Tax Officer, Corporate Ward 6(3), Chennai-34. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan