Case Law › High Court › Contc/6093/2020 Of Sittikantha Mohapatra...

Contc/6093/2020 Of Sittikantha Mohapatra v. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), Cuttack

High Court 04 Mar 2021 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · cisnc

Parties

Date of order

04 Mar 2021

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

Case summary

In Contc/6093/2020 Of Sittikantha Mohapatra v. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), Cuttack, the High Court (2021) decided the matter.

Decision: Taking on record the above submission, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to the Opposite Party to dispose of the appeal filed by the Petitioner, not later than 5[th] May, 2021.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

02. 04.03.2021 M.K.Panda/K. Majhi 1. Heard Mr. P.C. Acharya, learned counsel for the Petitioner and Mr. R.S. Chimanka, learned counsel for Opposite Party. 2. This contempt petition complains of non-compliance of the order dated 3[rd] January, 2020 passed by this Court in W.P.(C) No.16283 of 2019. 3. Mr. Chimanka, learned counsel appearing for Opposite Party states that within two months from today the appeal of the Petitioner will be disposed of by a reasoned order. 4. Taking on record the above submission, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to the Opposite Party to dispose of the appeal filed by the Petitioner, not later than 5[th] May, 2021. 5. An urgent certified copy of the order be issued as per rules. (Dr. S. Muralidhar) Chief Justice (B. P. Routray) Judge

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.