Cooperative Bank And Others v. Commissioner Of
High Court
08 Oct 2021 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Cooperative Bank And Others v. Commissioner Of
Date of order
08 Oct 2021
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Cooperative Bank And Others v. Commissioner Of, the High Court (2021) decided the matter.
Issue: During the course of hearing,a dispute arose as to whether thepetitioner had carried out an e-mail filing of the appeal or whether it was an WP(C) NO.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS
FRIDAY, THE 8 DAY OF OCTOBER 2021 / 16TH ASWINA, 1943
WP(C) NO. 20958 OF 2021
PETITIONER:
PALODE CO-OPERATIVE AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT BANK LTD KUSAVOOR, KARIMANCODE, PALODE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 562, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY BY ADVS.ANIL D. NAIRTELMA RAJUSANGEETH JOSEPH JACOBCHRISTINA ANNA PAULARAVIND SREEKUMAR
RESPONDENTS:
1INCOME TAX OFFICER,NATIONAL FACELESS ASSESSMENT CENTRE, NATIONAL E-ASSESSMENT CENTRE-NEAC, ROOM NO 402, 2ND FLOOR, E-RAMP,NEAR GATE NO 10, JAWAHARLAL NEHRU STADIUM, NEW DELHI-110 003. 2COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)NATIONAL FACELESS APPEALS CENTRE, NATIONAL E-ASSESSMENTCENTRE-NEAC ROOM NO 402, 2ND FLOOR, E-RAMP, NEAR GATE NO 10, JAWAHARLAL NEHRU STADIUM, NEW DELHI-110 003.
OTHER PRESENT:
ADV. CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM - SC
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON08.10.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C) NO. 20958 OF 2021
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
................................................
W.P.(C) NO. 20958 OF 2021
…........................................
Dated this the 8[th] day of october, 2021
JUDGMENT
Petitioner seeks a relief of
disposal of Ext.P2 appeal in a time boundmanner.
2. An order of assessment was
passed against the petitioner on 31-5-2021
for the assessment year 2018-19.
Petitioner claims to have preferred anappeal through Ext.P2 before the 2[nd]respondent. During the course of hearing,a dispute arose as to whether thepetitioner had carried out an e-mail
filing of the appeal or whether it was an
WP(C) NO. 20958 OF 2021
3
e-filing of the appeal which was done by
the petitioner. The records producedbefore this Court shows that petitionerhad, initially, within the time limit forfiling an appeal, preferred the appealthrough e-mail, as the technical glitchesof the electronic portal of the Income TaxDepartment prevented the petitioner from
uploading the appeal through e-filingmethod. Subsequently when the glitcheswhere rectified, petitioner filed theappeal through the e-filing method.
3. Petitioner has produced Ext.P2acknowledgment receipt of e-filing dated23-09-2021. In view of the acknowledgmentreceipt Ext.P2 dated 23/9/2021, it isclear that petitioner has e-filed theappeal. The stay petition filed by thepetitioner is also pending consideration.
WP(C) NO. 20958 OF 2021
4
4. A perusal of the memorandum of
appeal reveals that the main issue
involved in the appeal relates to the
disallowance of the claim for deduction
under Section 80P. According to the
petitioner the said disallowance was
contrary to the judgment in Mavilayi Service
-Cooperative Bank and Others v. Commissioner of
Income Tax, Calicut and Others[2021 (1) KLT 485].
5. Since in similar matters this
Court has directed the appeal itself to be
considered and disposed of, it is
essential that the petitioner also betreated alike.
6. Accordingly this writ petitionis disposed of directing the 2[nd] respondentto consider and dispose of Ext.P2 appeal(asacknowledgedbye-filing
WP(C) NO. 20958 OF 2021
5
acknowledgement dated 23-09-2021) asexpeditiously as possible. Till suchordersarepassed,allcoercive
proceedings against petitioner pursuant toExt.P1 assessment order shall be kept in
abeyance.
AJM
Sd/-
BECHU KURIAN THOMASJUDGE
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 20958/2021
PETITIONER’S EXHIBITS:
Exhibit P1TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER FOR THE YEAR 2018-19 DATED 31.5.2021 PASSED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT.
Exhibit P2TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL MEMORANDUM FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2NDRESPONDENT DATED 5.6.2021.
Exhibit P3TRUE COPY OF THE STAY PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER DATED 5.6.2021.
Exhibit P4TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY FILED BY THE PETITIONER DATED 13.7.2021
RESPONDENT’S EXHIBITS: NIL
WP(C) NO. 20958 OF 2021
5
acknowledgement dated 23-09-2021) asexpeditiously as possible. Till suchordersarepassed,allcoercive
proceedings against petitioner pursuant toExt.P1 assessment order shall be kept in
abeyance.
AJM
Sd/-
BECHU KURIAN THOMASJUDGE
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 20958/2021
PETITIONER’S EXHIBITS:
Exhibit P1TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER FOR THE YEAR 2018-19 DATED 31.5.2021 PASSED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT.
Exhibit P2TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL MEMORANDUM FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2NDRESPONDENT DATED 5.6.2021.
Exhibit P3TRUE COPY OF THE STAY PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER DATED 5.6.2021.
Exhibit P4TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY FILED BY THE PETITIONER DATED 13.7.2021
RESPONDENT’S EXHIBITS: NIL
AJM //TRUE COPY// PA TO JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.