In Corporation v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.
Decision: In view thereof, for the reasons stated in the aforesaid order dated 30th June, 2005, which pertains to the very same assessee, we answer all the four questions of law in -2- favour of the assessee and against the revenue and accordingly the reference stands disposed of with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
O.O.C.J.
Income Tax Reference No.113 of 1998
Maharashtra State Financial
Corporation ..Applicant
vs.
The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Respondent
Mr.N.Thakkar with Mr.Rajesh Poojari i/b M/s Mulla and
Mulla for applicant.
Mr.P.S.Sahadervan i/b Mr.R.B.Upadhyay for respondent.
CORAM: Dr.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &S.J.KATHAWALLA JJ. 25th August, 2008
CORAM: Dr.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &
S.J.KATHAWALLA JJ.
25th August, 2008
P.C.
P.C.
1. Heard the learned Counsel for the applicant and the
learned Counsel for the respondent.
2. Both the learned Counsel appearing for the applicant
and respondent categorically state that the questions of
law raised in the above reference application are squarely
covered by the judgment of our High Court in the case of
The Commissioner of Income Tax Vs.Maharashtra State
Finance in ITR No. 291 of 1988 dated 30th June, 2005 in
favour of the Assessee and against the revenue. In view
thereof, for the reasons stated in the aforesaid order
dated 30th June, 2005, which pertains to the very same
assessee, we answer all the four questions of law in
-2-
favour of the assessee and against the revenue and
accordingly the reference stands disposed of with no order
as to costs.
(S.J.KATHAWALLA J.) (Dr.S.RADHAKRISHNAN J.)
(S.J.KATHAWALLA J.) (Dr.S.RADHAKRISHNAN J.)
(S.J.KATHAWALLA J.) (Dr.S.RADHAKRISHNAN J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.