Case LawHigh Court › Corporation v. The Commissioner Of Incom...

Corporation v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 25 Aug 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Corporation v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
25 Aug 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Corporation v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.

Decision: In view thereof, for the reasons stated in the aforesaid order dated 30th June, 2005, which pertains to the very same assessee, we answer all the four questions of law in -2- favour of the assessee and against the revenue and accordingly the reference stands disposed of with no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O.O.C.J. Income Tax Reference No.113 of 1998 Maharashtra State Financial Corporation ..Applicant vs. The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Respondent Mr.N.Thakkar with Mr.Rajesh Poojari i/b M/s Mulla and Mulla for applicant. Mr.P.S.Sahadervan i/b Mr.R.B.Upadhyay for respondent. CORAM: Dr.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &S.J.KATHAWALLA JJ. 25th August, 2008 CORAM: Dr.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & S.J.KATHAWALLA JJ. 25th August, 2008 P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the applicant and the learned Counsel for the respondent. 2. Both the learned Counsel appearing for the applicant and respondent categorically state that the questions of law raised in the above reference application are squarely covered by the judgment of our High Court in the case of The Commissioner of Income Tax Vs.Maharashtra State Finance in ITR No. 291 of 1988 dated 30th June, 2005 in favour of the Assessee and against the revenue. In view thereof, for the reasons stated in the aforesaid order dated 30th June, 2005, which pertains to the very same assessee, we answer all the four questions of law in -2- favour of the assessee and against the revenue and accordingly the reference stands disposed of with no order as to costs. (S.J.KATHAWALLA J.) (Dr.S.RADHAKRISHNAN J.) (S.J.KATHAWALLA J.) (Dr.S.RADHAKRISHNAN J.) (S.J.KATHAWALLA J.) (Dr.S.RADHAKRISHNAN J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan