Counsel Forthe Respondent: Sri A v. Raghu Ram
High Court
18 Feb 2025 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Counsel Forthe Respondent: Sri A v. Raghu Ram
Date of order
18 Feb 2025
Assessment year(s)
2003-2004
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Counsel Forthe Respondent: Sri A v. Raghu Ram, the High Court (2025) dismissed the appeal.
Decision: Therefore, the appeal filed by the Department is dismissed interms of the aforesaid Circular No.9 of 2024 dated 17.09.2024.T{owever, if the appeal comes within the exception of CircularNo.5 of 2024, it would be open to the Income Tax Department toseek revival ofthe appeal.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD
TUESDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARYTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHYAND
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA
INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL NO: 269 OF 2012
Appeal filed under Section 260(A) of the lncome-Tax Act, against the orderdated. 27 -06-2008 passed in lTA.No.991/Hydl2OOG for Assessment Year 2003-2004on the file of the lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal Hyderabad Bench ['B', ]Hyderabadpreferred against the Order dated. 21-08-2006 passed in ITA No.3-19 lo 322lAClT-16(1)/CIT(A)-V/2005-06 on the file of the Commissioner of lncome Tax (Appeals)-V,Hyderabad preferred against the Order dated: 22-02-2004 passed in PAN/GIR No.A/vqCN7326D on the file of the Assistant Commissioner of lncome Tax, Circle-16(1),Hyderabad.
Between:
The Commissioner of lncome Tax - lV, Hyderabad.
...APPELLANT
AND
Nagarjuna Aqua Exports Ltd., 6, Nagarjuna Hills, Punjagutta, Hyderabad - 82.
.,.RESPONDENT
Counsel for the Appellant: Ms. B. SAPNA REDDY, JUNIOR S.C. REP. SRI J.V. PRASAD, SENIOR S.C. INCOME TAX DEPT.
Counsel forthe Respondent: SRI A. V. RAGHU RAM
The Court delivered the following: JUDGMENT
II
THE HONOURABLE [P.SAM ] ANDTHE HONOT]RABLE [R,'\O]NANDIKONDA
ITTANo.[269][oF ][2012]
(per Hnn'ble Sri Justice [P.Sam Koshy)]
JUDGMENT
Heard Ms. [B.Sapna ][Reddy, ][leamed ][Junior ][Standing]Counsel representing [Mr. ][J.V.Prasad, ][learned ][Senior ][S:anding]Counsel for [the Income Tax Department ][for ][the ][appellant' ]['l)erused]the record.
This appeal appeal [[under ][Section ]][[Section ]][[260.4 ][of ][the ][Income ]][[of ][the ][Income ]][[the ][Income ]][[Income ]][['[ax ][Act']][[Act']]
2. This appeal appeal [[under ][Section ]][[Section ]][[260.4 ][of ][the ][Income ]][[of ][the ][Income ]][[the ][Income ]][[Income ]][['[ax ][Act']][[Act']]lg6l,hast,eenpreferredbytheRevenueastherrppellantthe [rrlder ][dated 27.06-2008 passed ][by ][the ][lnc'rme ][Tax]against Appellate l'ribunal, [Hyderabad ][Bench ]['B', ][Hyder:rbad' ][in]I.T.A.No.99lltryD/2006 [for ][the ][Assessment ][Year ][2003-0'+']
3. Central Board [of ][Direct ][Taxes ][(CBDT) ][has ][issued ][Circular]No.9 of 2024 dated [17.09.2024, ][amending ][the ][previou:' Circular]No.5 of 2024 dated [15.03'2024, ][by ][further ][enhancing the monetary]limits for filing appeals [by the Income Tax Department ][before the]Income ['fax ]r\ppe1late [Tribunals, ][High ][Courts and ][Supre'me ][Court]
I
,
as a measure for reducing litigation. In paragraph 2 of the saidCircular, we find that the monetary limit fixed for filing an appealbefore the High Court is Rs.2.00 crore.Circular, we find that the monetary limit fixed for filing an appealbefore the High Court is Rs.2.00 crore.
4. In the instant appeal, tax effect is well below the monetarylimit.
5. Therefore, the appeal filed by the Department is dismissed interms of the aforesaid Circular No.9 of 2024 dated 17.09.2024.T{owever, if the appeal comes within the exception of CircularNo.5 of 2024, it would be open to the Income Tax Department toseek revival ofthe appeal. There shall be no order as to costs.
6. Consequently, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall
stand closed.
SD/.K.SRINIVASA RAOJOINT REGISTRARJOINT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
s CTION OFFICER
To,1The lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal Hyderabad Bench 'B', Hyderabad2The Commissioner of lncome Tax (Appeals)-V, HyderabadThe Assistant Commissioner of lncome Tax, Circle-16(1), Hyderabad.1The lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal Hyderabad Bench 'B', Hyderabad2The Commissioner of lncome Tax (Appeals)-V, HyderabadThe Assistant Commissioner of lncome Tax, Circle-16(1), Hyderabad.4One CC to Sri J.V. Prasad, S.C. for lncome Tax 5One CC to Sri A. V. Raghu Ram, Advocate CtTwo CD CopiesPlp/PSLCtTwo CD CopiesPlp/PSL
HIGH COURT
DATED:1810212025
6. Consequently, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall
stand closed.
SD/.K.SRINIVASA RAOJOINT REGISTRARJOINT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
s CTION OFFICER
To,1The lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal Hyderabad Bench 'B', Hyderabad2The Commissioner of lncome Tax (Appeals)-V, HyderabadThe Assistant Commissioner of lncome Tax, Circle-16(1), Hyderabad.1The lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal Hyderabad Bench 'B', Hyderabad2The Commissioner of lncome Tax (Appeals)-V, HyderabadThe Assistant Commissioner of lncome Tax, Circle-16(1), Hyderabad.4One CC to Sri J.V. Prasad, S.C. for lncome Tax 5One CC to Sri A. V. Raghu Ram, Advocate CtTwo CD CopiesPlp/PSLCtTwo CD CopiesPlp/PSL
HIGH COURT
DATED:1810212025
JUDGMENTITTA.No.269 ot 2012
DISMISSING THE APPEAL
\ql[?r{]
.HE RS14(o(r1aflr.inzsi(-tOs-)aTC I1to
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.