Case Law › High Court › Counsel v. Marubeni Itochu Steel P. Ltd

Counsel v. Marubeni Itochu Steel P. Ltd

High Court 05 May 2016 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · dhcdb

Parties

Date of order

05 May 2016

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Counsel v. Marubeni Itochu Steel P. Ltd, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI 1. + ITA 129/2016 PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-06 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Rahul Chaudhary, Senior Standing counsel. versus MARUBENI ITOCHU STEEL P. LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Himanshu Sinha and Ms. Vrinda Tulshan, Advocates. % CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU O R D E R05.05.2016 1. The questions sought to be urged in this appeal by the Revenue against the judgment dated 24[th] July 2015 of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (‘ITAT’) in ITA No. 761/Del/2015 for the Assessment Year (‘AY’) 2010-11 stand covered against it by the decisions of this Court in Li & Fung India Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax (2014) 361 ITR 85 (Del), CIT v. Marubeni India Pvt. Ltd 277 CTR 189 (Del) and the order dated 28[th] April 2016 passed by this Court in ITA 252/2016 (Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-6 v. Mitsui & Co. India Pvt. Ltd). ITA 129/2016 Page 1 of 2 2. No substantial question of law arises. The appeal is dismissed. S. MURALIDHAR, J MAY 05, 2016 dn VIBHU BAKHRU, J ITA 129/2016 Page 2 of 2

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.