Counsel v. Samsung India Electronics Ltd
High Court
03 Sep 2012 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Counsel v. Samsung India Electronics Ltd
Date of order
03 Sep 2012
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Counsel v. Samsung India Electronics Ltd, the High Court (2012) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
$~20 & 24
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
%
Date of Decision : 3[rd] September, 2012.
+ ITA 113/2010 + ITA 143/2010 + ITA 143/2010
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Appellant
Through:
Ms. Suruchi Aggarwal, Sr. Standing
Counsel.
versus
SAMSUNG INDIA ELECTRONICS LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Satyen Sethi and Mr. Arta Trana
Mr. Satyen Sethi and Mr. Arta Trana Panda, Advocates.
CORAM:
MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT MR. JUSTICE R.V. EASWAR
R.V.EASWAR, J: (OPEN COURT)
For orders see ITA No.98/2010.
R.V.EASWAR, J.
S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.
SEPTEMBER 03, 2012
vld
ITA Nos.113 & 143 of 2010 Page 1 of 1
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue