Case Law › High Court › Court In Commissioner Of Income Tax v. C...

Court In Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Camco Colour Co.,254 Itr 565, The Appeal Is Liable To Be Dismissed

High Court 07 Feb 2005 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

07 Feb 2005

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Court In Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Camco Colour Co.,254 Itr 565, The Appeal Is Liable To Be Dismissed, the High Court (2005) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: 254 ITR 565 Accordingly the Appeal is dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 883 OF 2000 The Commissioner of Income Tax, Mumbai .. Appellant V/s. Allana Exports Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai .. Respondent Ms. S.V. Bharucha for the Appellant Ms. Vasanti Patel for the Respondent CORAM : S. RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM : S. RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM : S. RADHAKRISHNAN & J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 07.02.2005 DATED : 07.02.2005 DATED : 07.02.2005 P.C.:- P.C.:- 1. Heard the learned counsel for the Appellant and the Respondent. The learned counsel for the Revenue states that the present Appeal involves tax liability of less than Rs. 2,00,000/- and in view of the judgment of this Court in Commissioner of Income Tax v. Camco Colour Co.,254 ITR 565, the Appeal is liable to be dismissed. 254 ITR 565 Accordingly the Appeal is dismissed. (S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.