Court In Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Sudarshan
High Court
18 Aug 2004 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Court In Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Sudarshan
Date of order
18 Aug 2004
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Court In Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Sudarshan, the High Court (2004) decided the matter.
Decision: Appeal is dismissed in limine.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYO.O.C.J.
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 393 OF 2002
The Commissioner of Income Tax,Mumbai City-I, Mumbai.
v/s.
M/s.Allana Cold Storage Ltd.
.. Appellant
.. Respondent
Ms.S.V.Bharucha i/by Mr.H.D.Rathod for appellant.
Mr.S.S.Shetty for respondent.
CORAM: R.M.LODHA ANDJ.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED:18thAugust, 2004
P.C.
In the appeal, according to the revenue, the
following two substantial questions of law arise:-
allowed the deductions u/s.80 HHC of the
Income Tax Act?
Amplification Bearings Corporation Ltd., 246 ITR
295, the controversy stands concluded.
court in Commissioner of Income-Tax v. Sudarshan
Chemicals Industries Ltd., 245 ITR 769.
4. No substantial question of law arises. Appeal
is dismissed in limine.
(R.M.LODHA,J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue