Court In Gkn Driveshafts (India) Ltd v. Income-Tax
High Court
01 Feb 2005 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Court In Gkn Driveshafts (India) Ltd v. Income-Tax
Date of order
01 Feb 2005
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Court In Gkn Driveshafts (India) Ltd v. Income-Tax, the High Court (2005) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 3196 OF 2004
Pirojsha Godrej Foundation .. Petitioner
V/s.
Vijaya K. Kutty and Another .. Respondents
Mr. J.D. Mistry i/b. M/s. Maneksha & Sethna for the
Petitioner
Mr. B.M. Chatterjee with Mr. R. Ashokan for the
Respondents
CORAM : S. RADHAKRISHNAN &
CORAM : S. RADHAKRISHNAN &
CORAM : S. RADHAKRISHNAN &
J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 01.02.2005
DATED : 01.02.2005
DATED : 01.02.2005
P.C.:-
P.C.:-
1. Heard the learned counsel for the Petitioner and the
learned counsel for the Respondents. By this Petition,
the Petitioner is basically challenging the Notice dated
18.5.2004 issued by the Assistant Director of Income Tax
under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
Thereafter the Assistant Director of Income Tax by an
letter dated 10.6.2004 has already given the reasons for
such re-opening of the Assessment under Section 148 of
the Income Tax Act. The learned counsel for the
Petitioner brought to our notice judgment of the Supreme
Court in GKN Driveshafts (India) Ltd. v. Income-Tax
GKN Driveshafts (India) Ltd. v. Income-TaxOfficer and Others 259 ITR 19.
Officer and Others 259 ITR 19
2. In view of the said judgment in GKN Driveshafts
GKN Driveshafts(India) Ltd. v. Income-Tax Officer and Others 259 ITR19, wherein the Supreme Court has observed as under:-
(India) Ltd. v. Income-Tax Officer and Others 259 ITR
19
"We see no justifiable reason to interfere with the order under challenge. However, we clarify that when a notice under section 148 of the Income-tax Act is
issued, the proper course of action for the noticee
is to file a return and if he so desires, to seek
( 2 )
reasons for issuing notices. The Assessing Officer
is bound to furnish reasons within a reasonable time.
On receipt of reasons, the noticee is entitled to
file objections to issuance of notice and the
Assessing Officer is bound to dispose of the same by
passing a speaking order. In the instant case, as
the reasons have been disclosed in these proceedings,
the Assessing Officer has to dispose of the
objections, if filed, by passing a speaking order,
before proceeding with the assessment in respect of
the aforesaid five assessment years."
3. The learned counsel for the Petitioner states that
the Petitioner will file the objections with regard to
the aforesaid Notice. The learned counsel appearing for
the Respondents states that if such objections are filed
within a period of two weeks, the Assessing Officer shall
dispose of the same, as expeditiously as possible, by
passing a speaking order before proceeding with the final
assessment. Rule is made absolute in the above terms.
(S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.)
(S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.