Case LawHigh Court › Court In The Case Of Commissioner Of Inc...

Court In The Case Of Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Manjara Shetkari Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd., Reported

High Court 23 Jun 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Court In The Case Of Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Manjara Shetkari Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd., Reported
Date of order
23 Jun 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Court In The Case Of Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Manjara Shetkari Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd., Reported, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1086 OF2004 INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1086 OF The Commissioner of Income Tax - IV, Pune ...Appellant V/s. Shri Pandurang SSK Ltd. ...Respondents Mr.Vimal Gupta i/b. Mr.P. Kapoor for the Appellant. CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. ANDV.M. KANADE, J. CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. AND V.M. KANADE, J. DATED : JUNE 23, 2008 DATED : JUNE 23, 2008 DATED : JUNE 23, 2008 P.C. :- P.C. :- P.C. :- . Counsel for the department fairly states that the question of law stated in paragraph 4 has been answered against the department vide Judgment of this Court in the case of Commissioner of Income-Tax v.Manjara Shetkari Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd., reportedin (2008) 301 ITR 191 (Bom). . Appeal is Dismissed. CHIEF JUSTICE CHIEF JUSTICE V.M. KANADE, J. V.M. KANADE, J.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan