Court In The Case Of Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Manjara Shetkari Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd., Reported
High Court
23 Jun 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Court In The Case Of Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Manjara Shetkari Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd., Reported
Date of order
23 Jun 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Court In The Case Of Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Manjara Shetkari Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd., Reported, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1086 OF2004
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1086 OF
The Commissioner of Income Tax - IV,
Pune ...Appellant
V/s.
Shri Pandurang SSK Ltd. ...Respondents
Mr.Vimal Gupta i/b. Mr.P. Kapoor for the Appellant.
CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. ANDV.M. KANADE, J.
CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. AND
V.M. KANADE, J.
DATED : JUNE 23, 2008
DATED : JUNE 23, 2008
DATED : JUNE 23, 2008
P.C. :-
P.C. :-
P.C. :-
. Counsel for the department fairly states that
the question of law stated in paragraph 4 has been
answered against the department vide Judgment of this Court in the case of Commissioner of Income-Tax v.Manjara Shetkari Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd., reportedin (2008) 301 ITR 191 (Bom).
. Appeal is Dismissed.
CHIEF JUSTICE
CHIEF JUSTICE
V.M. KANADE, J.
V.M. KANADE, J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.