Court In The Case Of Snowcem India Limited v. Dy. Commissioner Of Income
High Court
15 Dec 2009 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Court In The Case Of Snowcem India Limited v. Dy. Commissioner Of Income
Date of order
15 Dec 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Court In The Case Of Snowcem India Limited v. Dy. Commissioner Of Income, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: The appeal is thus dismissed in limine with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
1
acd
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODG.) NO. 2755 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax-2,Mumbai.
...Appellant.
V/s.
M/s Jiffy Trading & Investment Pvt. Ltd... Respondent. ----
Mr. Vimal Gupta, counsel for the Appellant.Mr. A.K. Jasani , for the Respondent.
----
CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 15TH DECEMBER, 2009
P.C.:
1.Heard learned counsel for the revenue and learned counsel for the respondent.
2.Objections overruled. The Registry is directed to register the appeal. By consent of parties, appeal is taken for hearing.
3.Both parties agree that the issue is covered by the Judgment of this
Court in the case of Snowcem India Limited Vs. Dy. Commissioner of Income
Tax reported in [2009] 313 ITR 170 (Bom), as also the Judgment dated
2
24.03.2009 in the case of The Commissioner of Income Tax V/s Natural Gems
Limited in Income Tax Appeal No.778 of 2007.
4.In this view of the matter, no substantial question of law arises in this
appeal. The appeal is thus dismissed in limine with no order as to costs.
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
(V.C.DAGA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue