Case LawHigh Court › C.periyasamy v. The Deputy Commissioner...

C.periyasamy v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Taxbenami Prohibition,Room

High Court 27 Aug 2024 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
C.periyasamy v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Taxbenami Prohibition,Room
Date of order
27 Aug 2024
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In C.periyasamy v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Taxbenami Prohibition,Room, the High Court (2024) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 27.08.2024 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI WP.No.4818 of 2023, 6026, 6028, 6034, 6036, 6014, 6020, 6025, 6030 & 6032 of 2023and WMP.Nos.4842, 4843, 6033, 6038, 6042, 6047, 6045, 6046, 6049 and 6050 of 2023 C.Periyasamy... Petitioner in W.P.No.4818 of 2023 Vs The Deputy Commissioner of Income TaxBenami Prohibition,Room No.2, Ground Floor A Wing,Income Tax Investigation Wing Building,46, M.G.Road, Nungambakkam,Chennai-34.....Respondents in W.P.No.4818 of 2023 Prayer In W.P.No.4818 of 2023 :- Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records on the file of the respondent and quash the impugned show cause notice under Section 24(1) of the Prohibition of Benami property Transactions Act, 1988 in F.No.BPU-CHE/AF/MN/475/2022-23 dated 02.11.2022 issued by the respondent as illegal, arbitrary and without jurisdiction. For Petitioners : Mr.R.Sivaraman in all the petitions 1/4 For Respondenta : Mr.M.Sheela,Sp.P.P. In all the petitions COMMON ORDER These writ petitions have been filed challenging the show cause notice under Section 24(1) of the Prohibition of Benami property Transactions Act, 1988 in F.No.BPU-CHE/AF/MN/475/2022-23 dated 02.11.2022 issued by the respondent as illegal, arbitrary and without jurisdiction. 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that during pendency of these writ petitions, the authority passed an order on 21.02.2023, against which, the petitioners have preferred appeal and the same was rejected vide order dated 27.03.2024. Challenging the same, the petitioners have filed writ petition in W.P.no.13681 of 2024 and the same is pending. Hence, nothing survives for adjudication. Further, the learned counsel seeks liberty to canvas all the points in the other writ petition. 3. Recording the submission made by the petitioner, these writ petitions are disposed of. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are 2/4 closed. No costs. However the petitioners are at liberty to canvas all the point in the other writ petition. 27.08.2024 rli To The Deputy Commissioner of Income TaxBenami Prohibition,Room No.2, Ground Floor A Wing,Income Tax Investigation Wing Building,46, M.G.Road, Nungambakkam,Chennai-34. 3/4 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis M.DHANDAPANI, J. Rli WP.No.4818 of 2023, 6026, 6028, 6034, 6036, 6014, 6020, 6025, 6030 & 6032 of 2023 27.08.2024
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan