Cra/6/2008 Of V. S. Dempo And Company Pvt.ltd v. S. Dempo And Company Pvt.ltd
High Court
26 Aug 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hcbgoa
Parties
Cra/6/2008 Of V. S. Dempo And Company Pvt.ltd v. S. Dempo And Company Pvt.ltd
Date of order
26 Aug 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Cra/6/2008 Of V. S. Dempo And Company Pvt.ltd v. S. Dempo And Company Pvt.ltd, the High Court (2008) allowed the appeal.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 6 OF 2008
V. S. DEMPO AND COMPANY PVT.LTD.
Versus
THE ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX PANAJI
... Petitioner
... Respondent
Mr. Sudin M. S. Usgaonkar, Advocate for the applicant.
Mr. S. R. Rivonkar, Advocate for the respondent.
P.C.
-Coram:S. C. DHARMADHIKARI &SANTOSH BORA, JJ.
-Date:
26th August, 2008
For the reasons set out in the application, the order of theRegistrar refusing to register the subject proceedings, stands quashed andset aside, provided the applicant/appellant fulfills the requirement andfiles a certified copy of the order impugned in the appeal, so also sets outdetails in regard to its communication. If the compliance is made bySaturday, 30th August, 2008, then, Office to proceed and number theappeal. Civil Revision Application No.5/08 allowed in the above termsand disposed off. No order as costs.
S. C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.
ssm.
SANTOSH BORA, J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue