C.r.building,B.c.patel Path, Patna v. Shri Shanker Rice & Oil Mills, At And P.o
High Court
11 Nov 2009 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · patnahcucisdb94
Parties
C.r.building,B.c.patel Path, Patna v. Shri Shanker Rice & Oil Mills, At And P.o
Date of order
11 Nov 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In C.r.building,B.c.patel Path, Patna v. Shri Shanker Rice & Oil Mills, At And P.o, the High Court (2009) allowed the appeal.
Decision: The appeal is accordingly allowed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MA No.383 of 2007
COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS, PATNA,
C.R.BUILDING,B.C.PATEL PATH, PATNA
….RESPONDENT-APPELLANT
Versus
SHRI SHANKER RICE & OIL MILLS, AT AND P.O.
SITAMARHI, DISTRICT SITAMARHI,
BIHAR.
…APPELLANT-RESPONDENT
-----------
5.
11.11.2009
Heard Mr. Sanjay Kumar for the appellant and learned counsel for the respondent. This appeal under section 130 of the Customs Act,1962, is directed against the order dated 9.4.2007, passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, Eastern Zone Bench, Kolkatta, in Customs Appeal No. CDM-162 of 2003 (Ms Shri Shankar Rice & Oil Mills. Vs. Commissioner of Customs, Patna), whereby the appeal preferred by the present respondent has been allowed and the order
dated 18.06.2003, passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) Customs
& Central Excise, Patna, in Appeal
No.204/PAT/CUS/APPEAL/2003 (Annexure-3), has been set aside.
We have perused the materials on record and considered the submissions of learned counsel for the parties. It appears that the learned Tribunal has disposed of the matter in a most perfunctory manner. The Tribunal is hereby reminded that it is a forum of facts and is, therefore, duty-bound to examine all issues of facts and law which arise in the matter before it, which is the sine-qua non for creation of any statutory Tribunal.
hr
Reference may be made to judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of Commissioner of Central Excise, Bangalore Vs. Srikumar Agencies and Ors., reported in (2009) (l) S.C.C. 469. We are, therefore, of the view that the impugned order falls far short of the requirements and is unsustainable in law.
In the result, the order dated 9.4.2007, passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, Eastern Zone Bench, Kolkatta, in Customs Appeal CDM-162 of 2003, is hereby set aside. The matter is remitted to the Tribunal to dispose of the said Custom Appeal No. CDM.162/2003 in accordance with law. The Tribunal shall also keep in view the judgment of this Court in the Case of M/s Kumar Sain Traders Vs. Union of India, reported in 2005 (2) PLJR 744, as well as the order dated 04.05.2005 (Annexure-5), passed by the same Bench in MJC No.973 of 2001(M/s Hillman Woolen Co. Vs. The Union of India & Ors.).
The appeal is accordingly allowed.
( S. K. Katriar )
( Kishore K. Mandal )
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.