Case Law › High Court › Cres/41/2013 Of Commissioner Of Income T...

Cres/41/2013 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax Jai v. Moti Lal Sachdeva

High Court 08 Apr 2013 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · jaipur

Parties

Date of order

08 Apr 2013

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Allowed

Case summary

In Cres/41/2013 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax Jai v. Moti Lal Sachdeva, the High Court (2013) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

D.B.Income Tax Reference Application No.4/2006. 08.04.2013. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AJAY RASTOGIHON'BLE MR.JUSTICE VEERENDR SINGH SIRADHANA Mrs.Parinitoo Jain, for applicant. ***** Application has been filed for restoration of ITR(ITAP),which was dismissed on account of peremptory order passedby the court along with an application U/s.5 of Limitation Actseeking condonation of delay in filing the restorationapplication. This court is satisfied with the explanation furnished forthe delay caused in filing the application duly supported byan affidavit. Accordingly, the application seeking condonation ofdelay u/S.5 of Limitation Act and the restoration applicationboth stand allowed subject to deposition of Rs.1,000/- by theapplicant with the Secretary, State Legal Services Authority,receipt whereof be filed in the registry, on doing so the ordershall stand recalled and the ITR(ITAP) be restored to itsoriginal number. Office to proceed. (VEERENDR SINGH SIRADHANA),J. (AJAY RASTOGI), J. All corrections made in judgment/order have beenincorporated in the judgment/order being emailed.Solanki DS, P.A.incorporated in the judgment/order being emailed.Solanki DS, P.A.

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.