Case Law › High Court › Crl Mp/1961/2024 Of Varadarajan Kumarave...

Crl Mp/1961/2024 Of Varadarajan Kumaravel v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 17 Apr 2024 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · hc_cis_mas

Parties

Date of order

17 Apr 2024

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Allowed

Case summary

In Crl Mp/1961/2024 Of Varadarajan Kumaravel v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2024) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Having satisfied with the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit filed in support of this petition, this petition stands allowed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

Crl.MP.No.1961 of 2024 Crl.RC.SR.No.3363 of 2024 M.DHANDAPANI, J. The present Miscellaneous petition has been filed seeking to condone the delay of 99 days in filing this criminal revision petition against the order passed in Crl.M.P.No.3990 of 2022 in ECCC.NO.156 of 2016 on the file of the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (E.O.II) Egmore, Chennai – 600 008. 2. Mr.C.Murali Krishnan, learned Special Public Prosecutor (PP) appearing for the respondent has no objection for this petition being allowed. 3. Having satisfied with the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit filed in support of this petition, this petition stands allowed. 4. Registry is directed to number the Criminal Revision, if the papers are otherwise in order and post the main case for admission. 17.04.2024 rap

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.