Crl Op/16377/2019 Of Anjugaselvi Alagiri v. The Deputy Director Of Income Tax (Inv)
High Court
25 Jun 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Crl Op/16377/2019 Of Anjugaselvi Alagiri v. The Deputy Director Of Income Tax (Inv)
Date of order
25 Jun 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Crl Op/16377/2019 Of Anjugaselvi Alagiri v. The Deputy Director Of Income Tax (Inv), the High Court (2019) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 25.06.2019
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH
Crl.O.P.Nos.16377, 16378, 16379, 16380, 16382, 16383, 16384 of
2019
Anjuga Selvi Alagiri-Vs-The Deputy Director of Income Tax (Inv),Unit - I (1),Income Tax Office,Mahathma Gandhi Salai,Nungambakkam,Chennai - 600 034.
... Petitioner in all Crl.O.Ps-Vs-... Respondent in all Crl.O.Ps
Common Prayer:Criminal Original petition filed under Section 482 of Code
of Criminal Procedure, to direct the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate Court (EO-II), Egmore, at Allikulam Commercial Complex, Egmore, Chennai, to furnish the certified copies of 1. Complaint, 2. Affidavit 3. Petition and 4. Non-bailable Warrant in EOCC.Nos.151, 152, 154, 153, 157, 155 and 156 of 2018 respectively, pending the above Crl.O.P.For Petitioner : M/s.V.Bagyalakshmi
ORDER
These petitions have been filed for a direction to the Court below to
furnish the certified copy of the complaint filed by the respondent against the petitioner.
2. It is brought to the notice of this Court that Non Bailable Warrant
was issued against the petitioner in all the complaints filed by the respondent and the petitioner approached this Court, seeking for anticipatory bail. This Court by an order dated 23.05.2019 has given necessary directions and ensured that the petitioner is not arrested on her return to India. Therefore, the liberty of the petitioner is safeguarded.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the memo of appearance has already been filed on behalf of the petitioner and in
spite of the same certified copy of the complaint has not been furnished to the counsel.
4. In view of the limited scope of this petition, there shall be a
direction to the Court below to furnish the counsel for the petitioner, the certified copy of the complaint filed by the respondent.
above directions.
25.06.2019Index : Yes/NoInternet: Yes/Norka/msrmTo1. The Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate Court (EO-II), Egmore, at Allikulam Commercial Complex, Egmore, Chennai,2. The Public Prosecutor, Madras High Court.
N.ANAND VENKATESH, J.
Crl.O.P.Nos. 16377, 16378, 16379,16380, 16382, 16383, 16384 of 2019
25.06.2019
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.