Crl.a/100363/2021 Of The Income Tax Department v. Jyoti Ramesh Chindak
High Court
09 Jul 2024 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karhcdharwad
Parties
Crl.a/100363/2021 Of The Income Tax Department v. Jyoti Ramesh Chindak
Date of order
09 Jul 2024
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Crl.a/100363/2021 Of The Income Tax Department v. Jyoti Ramesh Chindak, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
CHANDRASHEKARLAXMANKATTIMANI
HIGHCOURT OFKARNATAKA
NC: 2024:KHC-D:9451CRL.A No. 100363 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 9 DAY OF JULY, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.RACHAIAH
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 100363 OF 2021
BETWEEN:
THE INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, BY ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-I, PLOT NO.123, SARAF COLONY, KHANAPUR ROAD, SHRADDHA BUILDING, TILAKWADI, BELAGAVI-590006.
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI. M. DILIP, ADVOCATE)
AND:
SMT. JYOTI RAMESH CHINDAK SHIVAGANGA, SAMBHAJI GALLI, JOSHI MALA, KHASBAG, SHAHAPUR, BELAGAVI - 590003.
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. SANGRAM S. KULKARNI, ADVOCATE)
THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL IS FILED U/S 378(4) OF CR.P.C., SEEKING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 03.04.2021 PASSED BY THE COURT OF JMFC III, BELGAUM IN CC NO.692/2014, AND TO ALLOW THE COMPLAINT AS PRAYED FOR BY ALLOWING THIS APPEAL.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
The matter is listed today, for non compliance of the office objections for fifth time. It seems that Mr. M.Dilip, learned counsel for the appellant has not made any effort either to comply with the office objections or to represent the case. Hence, it is appropriate to dismiss the case for non-compliance.
Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Registry is directed to delete the name of Sri. K.V.Aravind, learned counsel from the cause list and show the name of M.Dilip, learned counsel representing the appellant in the case.
Sd/- JUDGE
JS/- List No.: 2 Sl No.: 9
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.