Case LawHigh Court › Crl.a/194/2022 Of The Income Tax Departm...

Crl.a/194/2022 Of The Income Tax Department v. Smt.bhaskara Subramanyam Jayashree

High Court 28 Feb 2025 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Crl.a/194/2022 Of The Income Tax Department v. Smt.bhaskara Subramanyam Jayashree
Date of order
28 Feb 2025
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Crl.a/194/2022 Of The Income Tax Department v. Smt.bhaskara Subramanyam Jayashree, the High Court (2025) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Hence, the appeal is dismissed as not maintainable.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28 DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 194 OF 2022 BETWEEN: THE INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT BY ITS INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD No.7(2)(1) BMTC BUILDING, 80 FEET ROAD, 6 BLOCK KORAMANGALA BANGALORE – 560 095. …APPELLANT Digitally signed byLAKSHMINARAYANAMURTHY RAJASHRILocation: HIGHCOURT OFKARNATAKA (BY SRI SUSHAL TIWARI N, ADVOCATE) AND: SMT. BHASKARA SUBRAMANYAM JAYASHREE 52 YEARS, No.42, 1 FLOOR, 8 E MAIN, 4 BLOCK, JAYANAGAR BANGALORE - 560 041. …RESPONDENT THIS CRL.A. IS FILED UNDER SECTION 378(4) Cr.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 12.10.2018 PASSED BY THE SPL.COURT FOR ECONOMICS OFFENCES AT BENGALURU IN C.C.No.47/2018 AND TO ALLOW THE COMPLAINT AS PRAYED FOR BY ALLOWING THIS APPEAL. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR ORAL JUDGMENT This appeal is filed under Section 378(4) of Cr.P.C. The Income Tax Department has filed this appeal challenging the order dated 12.10.2018 passed in C.C.No.47/2018 on the application filed by the respondent - accused under Section 245 of Cr.P.C., whereunder the respondent - accused has been discharged for offence punishable under Section 276CC of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 2. The impugned order is not judgment of acquittal. The impugned order is passed on the discharge application filed by the accused. Therefore, the appeal is not maintainable. 3. Learned counsel for the appellant has filed memo seeking conversion of the appeal into Criminal Revision Petition. There is no provision in Cr.P.C., for - 3 - converting Criminal Appeal into Criminal Revision Petition. Hence, the appeal is dismissed as not maintainable. The appellant is at liberty to file Criminal Revision Petition. Registry is directed to return the documents to the learned counsel for the appellant. Sd/- (SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR)JUDGE KG List No.: 1 Sl No.: 9
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan