Case LawHigh Court › Crl.a/236/2022 Of The Income Tax Departm...

Crl.a/236/2022 Of The Income Tax Department v. Smt Bhaskara Subramanyam Jayashree

High Court 24 Mar 2022 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Crl.a/236/2022 Of The Income Tax Department v. Smt Bhaskara Subramanyam Jayashree
Date of order
24 Mar 2022
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Crl.a/236/2022 Of The Income Tax Department v. Smt Bhaskara Subramanyam Jayashree, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27 DAY OF MARCH, 2022 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE K. NATARAJAN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.236 OF 2Q22 BEIWEEN THE INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT.BY ITS INCOME TAX OFFICERWARD NO.7 (2) (1), BMIT'C BUILDING80 FEET ROAD, 6TH BLOCKKORAMANGALABENGALURU - 560 O95. ... APPELLANI (BY SRI ARAVIND K V, ADVOCATE) Al SMI BHASKARA SUBRAMANYAM JAYASHREE| AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS,NO.42, 1ST FLOOR 8TH E MAIN41TH BLOCK, JAYANAGARBENGALULRU... RESPONDENT (BY SRI ANNAMALAI S, ADVOCATE) THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 378(4) OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED.17.10.2018 PASSED BY THE SPL.COURT FOR ECONOMIC.OFFENCES AT BENGALURU IN C.C.NO.49/2018 AND TO ALLOW|THE COMPLAINT AS PRAYED FOR BY ALLOWING THIS APPEAL. THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL COMING ON FOR ADMISSION|THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT Learned counsel for the appellant submits that hemay be permitted to withdraw tne appeal witn liberty tofile Criminal Revision Petition. 2D.Submission of learned counsel for the appellant —is placed on record. 3.Accordingly, the appeal is'dismissedas|withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.| Sd/-— JUDGE| GBB
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan