Crl.a/374/2023 Of The Income Tax Department v. M/S New Bridge Business Centre Pvt., Ltd
High Court
10 Oct 2023 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Crl.a/374/2023 Of The Income Tax Department v. M/S New Bridge Business Centre Pvt., Ltd
Date of order
10 Oct 2023
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Crl.a/374/2023 Of The Income Tax Department v. M/S New Bridge Business Centre Pvt., Ltd, the High Court (2023) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Hence,the criminal appeal stands dismissed for non-complianceof office objections.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 10 DAY OF OCTOBER, 2023.
BEFORETHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S RACHAIAH|
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.374 OF 2023 (A)
BETWEEN:
THE INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT,BY THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS), CIRCLE-2(1), NO.59, HMT BHAVAN,BELLARY ROAD, GANGANAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 032.
APPELLANT.
(BY SRI. DILIP M, ADVOCATE (ABSENT) )
AND:
NC: 2023:KHC:36929CRL.A No. 374 of 2023
COURT FOR ECONOMIC OFFENCES IN C.C.NO.94/2019. (B)..CONVICT THE RESPONDENTS FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE|UNDER SECTION 2/6B OF INCOME TAX ACT.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THECOURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
On perusal of the order sheet, it appears tnat, thelearned counsel for the appellant Nas not complied the.office objections even though sufficient time nas beengranted, which shows that he is not interested to proceedwith the case. Today, the matter is listed for compliance ofoffice objections for the 3rd time. The counsel nas nottaken any steps to comply the office objections. Hence,the criminal appeal stands dismissed for non-complianceof office objections.
SNC|List No.: 1 S| No.: 9)CT: BHK|
Sd/-'JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.