Crl.mc/222/2021 Of A.l.jyotish Kumar v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
14 Jan 2021 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Crl.mc/222/2021 Of A.l.jyotish Kumar v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
14 Jan 2021
Assessment year(s)
1987-1988
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Crl.mc/222/2021 Of A.l.jyotish Kumar v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2021) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.G.ARUN
THURSDAY, THE 14TH DAY OF JANUARY 2021 / 24TH POUSHA,1942
Crl.MC.No.222 OF 2021(G)
CC 95/1992 OF ADDITIONAL CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE (E&O),ERNAKULAM
PETITIONER/S:
A.L.JYOTISH KUMARAGED 56 YEARSPARTNER, M/S. OUR COLLEGE,T.D.ROAD, ERNAKULAM,COCHIN-35
BY ADVS.SRI.SOORAJ T.ELENJICKALSRI.K.ARJUN VENUGOPALSHRI.ASWIN KUMAR M JSMT.HELEN P.A.SHRI.ARUN ROYSRI.SHAHIR SHOWKATH ALISHRI.MUHAMMED SUHAIR C.A
RESPONDENT/S:
THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXCIRCLE-3, DIVISION-II, C.R.BUILDINGS, I.S PRESS ROAD, COCHIN-18
OTHER PRESENT:
SC JOSE JOSEPH FOR INCOME TAX
THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FORADMISSION ON 14.01.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSEDTHE FOLLOWING:
Crl.MC.No.222 OF 2021(G)
-2-
ORDER
Dated this the 14[th] day of January, 2021
Petitioner is the 4[th] accused in C.C.No.95 of1992 of the Additional Chief Judicial MagistrateCourt (Economic Offences), Ernakulam and hasreceived summons to appear before the court.
2.The learned Senior Counsel for thepetitioner vehemently argued that, in the absenceof specific allegation against the petitioner,the proceedings against him is liable to bequashed. Learned Standing Counsel for Income TaxDepartment countered the contentions andsubmitted that accused Nos.2 and 3 in the casehad filed discharge petition before the trialcourt and those petitions being dismissed, hadfiled criminal revision petitions before thisCourt. Th criminal revision petitions filed by
Crl.MC.No.222 OF 2021(G)
-3-
accused 2 and 3 were allowed by quashing theimpugned order and directing the trial court toreconsider the applications for discharge.
In such circumstances, I deem it appropriatethat the petitioner also be provided anopportunity to file a discharge applicationbefore the trial court, wherein all contentions,including those raised in this Crl.M.C can beurged. Accordingly, this Crl.M.C is disposed ofwith the liberty as mentioned above.
Sd/-
V.G.ARUN JUDGE
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
ANNEXURE-A1
TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT NO. CC 95/92 ADDITIONAL CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE (ECONOMIC OFFCENCES0 COURT,ERNAKULAM
ANNEXURE-A2TRUE COPY OF THE DEATH CERTIFICATE NO.D0020167-17051511 DATED 17.05.2017
ANNEXURE-A3
A TRUE COPY THE STATEMENT OF TOTAL INCOME FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 1987-1988
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.