In Crl.m.c./3056/2016 Of Arun Kochhar v. Tajinder Kumar Acit Central Circle 19 Income Tax Department, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Siddharth S Dev, learned counsel appearing for petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition The same is dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
$~47
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 3056/2016 ARUN KOCHHAR ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Siddharth S Dev & Mr. Ujjwal Kumar, Advocates.
versus
TAJINDER KUMAR ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 19 INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT ..... Respondent
Through: None.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA O R D E R% 26.02.2018
No rejoinder is being filed by the petitioner till date.
Mr. Siddharth S Dev, learned counsel appearing for petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition
The same is dismissed as withdrawn.
FEBRUARY 26, 2018 NC
ANU MALHOTRA, J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue