Crl.m.c./3841/2018 Of Swadesh Kumar Mishra v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle 32(1)New Delhi
High Court
20 Mar 2019 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Crl.m.c./3841/2018 Of Swadesh Kumar Mishra v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle 32(1)New Delhi
Date of order
20 Mar 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Crl.m.c./3841/2018 Of Swadesh Kumar Mishra v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle 32(1)New Delhi, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
$~27&28
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+CRL.M.C. 3840/2018 & CRL.M.As.29085-86/2018RITU MISHRA Petitioner
Through: None
versus
ASSITANT COMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE32(1 )NEW DELHI RespondentThrough: Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, SeniorStanding Counsel
WITFI
+CRL.M.C. 3841/2018 & CRL.M.As.29087-88/2018SWADESH KUMAR MISHRA PetitionerThrough: None
versus
ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE32(1 )NEW DELHI RespondentThrough: Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, SeniorStanding Counsel
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHARORDER%20.03.2019
%
1. Learned Senior Standing Counsel for the respondentsubmitted that the Trial Court has already passed a judgment inthe cases on 28.2.2019, whereby the petitioners have alreadybeen convicted and the order on sentence has already beenpassed.
2. None on behalf of the It seems thatappears petitioners. the petitioners are not interested in pursuing the petitions, inview of the of the as well as the order onpassing judgment sentence the Trial Court. the areby Accordingly, petitions dismissed in default. Pending applications are also dismissed mdefault.
MARCH 20, 2019tp
CHANDER^EKHAR, J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue