Crl.mc/4634/2018 Of Shri.k.p. Johny v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
17 Jul 2018 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Crl.mc/4634/2018 Of Shri.k.p. Johny v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
17 Jul 2018
Assessment year(s)
2014-15
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Crl.mc/4634/2018 Of Shri.k.p. Johny v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.ABRAHAM MATHEW
TUESDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF JULY 2018 / 26TH ASHADHA, 1940
Crl.MC.No. 4634 of 2018
CC 446/2018 of ADDL.C.J.M.(E&O), ERNAKULAM
PETITIONER(S)/ACCUSED
SHRI.K.P. JOHNY,
S/O.K.D.PAULOSE, AGED 62 YEARS,
RESIDING AT MANAPPURAM HOUSE,
HOSPITAL ROAD, CHALAKUDY,
THRISSUR - 680307.
BY ADVS.SRI.T.M.SREEDHARAN (SR.)
SRI.V.P.NARAYANAN
SRI.R.BHASKARA KRISHNAN
RESPONDENT(S)/STATE AND COMPLAINANT :
1. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 2(1), THRISSUR, OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 2(1), THRISSUR, OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,
CIRCLE 2(1), RANGE 2, THRISSUR 3RD FLOOR,
AYAKAR BHAVAN, SAKTHAN THAMPURAN NAGAR, THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN - 680001. THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN - 680001.
2. THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, AAYAKAR BHAVAN, SAKTHAN THAMPURAN NAGAR, THRISSUR - 680001. AAYAKAR BHAVAN, SAKTHAN THAMPURAN NAGAR, THRISSUR - 680001.
3. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,
AAYAKAR BHAVAN, SAKTHAN THAMPURAN NAGAR,
THRISSUR - 680001.
4. THE STATE OF KERALA - REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, KOCHI - 682031.
BY SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX
BY SENIOR PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.C.S.HRITHWIK
THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17-07-2018,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
APPENDIX
PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS
ANNEXURE A- TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT NO.446/2018 FILED U/S.190 OF CR.PC 973 BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT FOR AY-2014-15.ANNEXURE B- TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 14/12/2017 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT.ANNEXURE C- TRUE COPY OF ORDER DATED 27/9/2017 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT U/S.271F ALONG WITH DEMAND NOTICE.ANNEXURE D- TRUE COPY OF THE MEMORANDUM OF APPEAL DATED 5/2/2018 FIELD BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE CIT(A).ANNEXURE E- TRUE COPY OF REPLY DATED 2/2/2018 GIVEN BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT.ANNEXURE F- TRUE COPY OF THE COMMON STAY PETITION DATED 5/2/2018 FIELD BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT FOR AY-2014-15.ANNEXURE G- TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 4/4/2018 IN WP(C) NO.11320 OF 2018 OF THIS HONOURABLE COURT.ANNEXURE H- TRUE COPY OF THE SUMMONS ISSUED TO THE 1ST PETITIONER IN CC NO.446/2018 ISSUED BY THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, ERNAKULAM.
RESPONDENT'(S) EXHIBITS:NIL
//TRUE COPY//
bka/-
PA TO JUDGE
K. ABRAHAM MATHEW, J.
--------------------------------------------------
Crl.M.C. No. 4634 of 2018
--------------------------------------------------
Dated this the 17[th] day of July, 2018
O R D E R
Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
2.In CC No. 446 of 2018 on the file of the AdditionalChief Judicial Magistrate Court (Economic Offences),Ernakulam. The petitioner is being proceeded againstunder Section 276 CC of the Income Tax Act for hisfailure to file Income Tax Return for the year 2014-15.The proceedings are sought to be quashed mainly onthe ground that the failure was not willful. Chief Judicial Magistrate Court (Economic Offences),Ernakulam. The petitioner is being proceeded againstunder Section 276 CC of the Income Tax Act for hisfailure to file Income Tax Return for the year 2014-15.The proceedings are sought to be quashed mainly onthe ground that the failure was not willful.
3.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, thelearned Standing Counsel for respondents 1 to 3 andthe learned Public Prosecutor.learned Standing Counsel for respondents 1 to 3 andthe learned Public Prosecutor.
3.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, thelearned Standing Counsel for respondents 1 to 3 andthe learned Public Prosecutor.learned Standing Counsel for respondents 1 to 3 andthe learned Public Prosecutor.
4.It is an admitted fact that the petitioner failed to fileIncome Tax Return in time for the year 2014-15. Anotice was issued to him under Section 148 of theIncome Tax Act to submit his return. In spite ofreceipt of the notice, he did not file it. This is theIncome Tax Return in time for the year 2014-15. Anotice was issued to him under Section 148 of theIncome Tax Act to submit his return. In spite ofreceipt of the notice, he did not file it. This is the
Crl.M.C. No. 4634 of 2018
..2..
circumstance in which the prosecution was lodgedagainst him.
5.Though there are several grounds mentioned in the
Crl.M.C., the only specific ground is that the failurewas not willful. This is a fact to be considered by thetrial court on the basis of the evidence adducedbefore it. Such disputed question of fact cannot bedecided by this court in a proceedings under Section482 Cr.P.C. There is no merit in this Crl.M.C.
Accordingly, this Crl.M.C. is dismissed.
bka/17.07.2018
Sd/-K. ABRAHAM MATHEWJUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.