Crlmp/2620/2015 Of Mahendra Kumar Nirwan v. Dy Commissioner Income Tax
High Court
08 Sep 2015 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · jaipur
Parties
Crlmp/2620/2015 Of Mahendra Kumar Nirwan v. Dy Commissioner Income Tax
Date of order
08 Sep 2015
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Crlmp/2620/2015 Of Mahendra Kumar Nirwan v. Dy Commissioner Income Tax, the High Court (2015) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
-1-
cfodIq Sz9lolqy 44<UTS Wayर
आदश
UbATS AVSH Tatas Alay AS{-2620/2015
Hers PHT TAA «ATA Tete HAA, SsqHy cae Teac, HAL
Tedih:08.09.2015
Haag=Taraate st adaret are gray
SATA PAX ott-CnoKch- Went cr aie st Su Mat ateachy atedat ata HSaT ATAaAHT- Tourn Ar arm a
--
WatTe atveH Tarael Alay at-482 QS WHAT Alea H WTAATAT HTad VT He AATACA “AAT AS:- Wey Hela Alaiees(aaah BUT Alaa)TAIL ASAT SRT ARTA WHT AeA-62/2013 H Ulead sresT feata24.04.2015 Al faved hthtUTA at el |
Taal Aaah WAT AFTater That Sth WaTaUb Aded Teal AAA“TIA Hh AHA SA AMA Hl GM Thar th Uh AS A A.159/2012 area ATAT-TTT ST, alret H rata Aaa AS, णजससTt ah Baa Hl Wat hm agaaFaread TAAL Hl ATTHAT GWT ASl Sl AT tel S AAT WAT H aes soy ATA asHYALU Weary-345/2011 Theta ATT- TagaAAT A eaATA FETA Bed HTAlay aml ote He fea aA wa, So FIR HAsaSled Tha Wa eecaTasy Wa act sl xहM, AT WidayT wh Tw Att aaah S| Ad: Ted Bet SeaTast AtTidal Ae Th ITA AT Sl Wt Hl WatSs 4Tite adsaat feay WTA
Taal] AACA SATATAT Aatdl Wal Hl YAH WTA alal Wedd Sh Aldeaal Sa Aare Ge AaedrHre He Tear Th WAT aealeaya eediasl Al Wartra staaWa HL WET HL GHA S AAT SAH GT ALTE SY FWe he ca]सTh SaTATaratert At Tet AL AT Tet, Tits EARTH HLAbl AleAAIIAE AAI Fel
Sh Besa Hh BaciadaThe Stal oth Sh ASM AcaieH ATS SI AAASAdH YassStat AATH UTS(2008)1 एस.um.um.474 HY aratdtatted That &Teh:
Ends of justice would be better served if valuable time of
the Court is spent in hearing those appeals rather thanentertaining petitions under Section482 Cr.P.C. at aninterlocutory stage which are often filed with some obliquemotive in order to circumvent the prescribed procedure, asis the case here, or to delay the trial which will enable theaccused to win over the witnesses by money or musclepower or they may become disinterested in givingevidence, ultimately resulting in miscarriage of justice.
oH ANA Fed HIG eA A SA AMAA H Hrs AX Al WAT Ala SI
अ.: Went cal aieWedd Asatte Atta ATAHT Atel Slatसfazed afAtSl Soh ATA A AA SAT IAAT GT At Paced Tea STAT I
(नi0 dqdiet ale TAT)
afactor/-M-21
''all corrections made in the judgment/order have been incorporated in the judgment/order being e-mailed.”araeoTa4/ps
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.