Crl.p/1053/2017 Of Sri H C Vishwanatha Babu v. The Income Tax Department
High Court
12 Nov 2020 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Crl.p/1053/2017 Of Sri H C Vishwanatha Babu v. The Income Tax Department
Date of order
12 Nov 2020
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Crl.p/1053/2017 Of Sri H C Vishwanatha Babu v. The Income Tax Department, the High Court (2020) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: In view of the memo, the petition stands| dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 12[th]DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2020
BEHKORK
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE K.SOMASHEKAR
CRIMINAL PETITION No.1053/2017
BETWEEN:
Sri.H.cC.Vishwanatha Babu»/o Channabasappa Holur,Aged about ol years, |R/at No.D-904, Brigade Gateway,Dr.Rajkumr Road,Malleshwaram, >Bangalore-S60055. |...Petitioner
(By Sri. Murali B.S., Advocate)
AND
The Income Tax Department,By Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax, ©Circle-2(2)(1), Koramangala,BMTC Complex,Bangalore-S60095.... Respondent
(By Sri.K.V.Aravind, Sr. Standing Counsel) |
This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 482 oftCr.P.C., praying to quash the private complaint filed bythe complainant vide Annexure-A and B and quash theproceedings in C.C.No.89/2016 on the file of the Spl.Court(Economic Offences), Bengaluru.
This Criminal Petition coming on for final hearing,through physical appearance this day, the court made thefollowing:
ORD ER
ori. Murali B.S. learned counsel for the petitioner is
present before the Court physically and filed a memo forwithdrawal stating that this petition has rendered |infructuous in view of the fact that proceedings inC.C.No0.89/2016has|beendisposed|oT|as|havingcompounded and the accused/petitioner being dischargedvide order dated 22.08.2019 as recorded by the trial court.
2.|Memo is placed on record.
3.|ori.K.V.Aravind, Senior standing counsel for|the respondent is present before the court physically.
4. In view of the memo, the petition stands|
dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/-.JUDGE.
JS/-
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue