Crl.p/200754/2018 Of S.rajendra Reddy v. Income Tax Department
High Court
04 Apr 2019 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · karhckalaburagi
Parties
Crl.p/200754/2018 Of S.rajendra Reddy v. Income Tax Department
Date of order
04 Apr 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Crl.p/200754/2018 Of S.rajendra Reddy v. Income Tax Department, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THR HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKAKALABURAGI! BENC
DATED THIS THE: DAY OF APRIL 2019
BRHRFO
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE K.SOMASHEKARCRIMINAL PETITION NO.200754/2018
BBRTWER
S. Rajendra Reddy©/o Rajeshwar ReddyAge: 94 Years, Occ: ChairmanNavodaya Education Raichur& MLA, NarayanpetTelangana-509210
(By Sri Chaitanyakumar C.M., Advocate)
6Petitioner
ANT
Income Tax DepartmentBy its Assistant DirectorOf Income Tax (Investigation)p[ !]Floor, Suresh ComplexInfantry Road, Sanjay Gandhi NagarBellari-583103
6Respondent
(By Sri Ameet Kumar Deshpande, Advocate)
This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 482 ofCode of Criminal Procedure, praying to allow the petition andconsequently quash the order dated 20.03.2018 passed bythe Addl. Senior Civil Judge ®& JMFC-I, Raichur iC.C.No.298/2016 and also quash the complaint pending onthe file of the LXXXI ACC & SJ, Bengaluru City (CCH-82)
(Special Court exclusively to deal with criminal cases relatingto elected MPs/ MLAs in the State of Karnataka) inspl.C.No.210/2018,
This petition coming on for admission this day, theCourt made the following:
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner files a memoseeking withdrawal of the petition as not pressed withliberty to file petition before the Principal Bench,Bangalore.
The memo is placed on record.
Accordingly,|thepetition1S.dismissedas
withdrawn with liberty to file a petition as sought for inaccordance with law/
Sd/-JUDGE
BL
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.