Crlp/206/2017 Of Mr. N. Anil Kumar Reddy v. Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
25 Mar 2019 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Crlp/206/2017 Of Mr. N. Anil Kumar Reddy v. Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
25 Mar 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Crlp/206/2017 Of Mr. N. Anil Kumar Reddy v. Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2019) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In the result, the Criminal Petition is allowed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
THE HON'BLE Dr . JUSTI CE SHAMEEM AKTHER
CRI MI NAL PETI TI ON No.2 0 6 OF 2 0 1 7
ORDER:
This Criminal Petition, under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, is filed by the petitioner/ A.8 to quash C.C.No.84 of 2012 on the file of the Special Judge for Economic Offences at Hyderabad.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner/ A.8, the learned counsel for respondent No.1/ complainant and perused the record.
3. In the course of submissions, it is brought to the notice of this Court that the petitioners/ A.1 to A.7 filed a petition to quash the said C.C. and the same was allowed by this Court vide order dated 08.08.2016 in Crl.P.No.6043 of 2012. It is also brought to the notice of this Court that the matter relates to deduction of depreciation in respect of machinery purchased to control the pollution. This aspect was elaborately dealt with in Crl.P.No.6043 of 2012 and ultimately, on merits, the proceedings against A.1 to A.7 in the said criminal case were quashed. The petitioner/ A.8 is also similarly placed. Under these circumstances, the proceedings against the petitioner/ A.8 in the said criminal case are also quashed.
4. In the result, the Criminal Petition is allowed.
Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed.
______________________
Dr . SHAMEEM AKTHER, J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.