Crl.p/3111/2017 Of M/S. Yojaka India Pvt. Ltd v. The Income Tax Department
High Court
23 Jan 2019 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Crl.p/3111/2017 Of M/S. Yojaka India Pvt. Ltd v. The Income Tax Department
Date of order
23 Jan 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Crl.p/3111/2017 Of M/S. Yojaka India Pvt. Ltd v. The Income Tax Department, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BBNGALURU|
DATED THIS THE 23 DAY OF JANUARY, 2019
BEFORE|
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR
CRIMINAL PEBRTITION NO.3111 OF 201
BETWEEN:
1.M/S.YOJAKA INDIA)PVT. LTD., A COMPANY REGISTEREDUNDER THE INDIAN COMPANIES ACTHAVING ITS RBGISTRBRED OFF.NO. 3-28/43, ABCO TRADE CENTREOFFRICEHK AT KORTARA CHOWMANGALURU- 575 OO]RBEPRBSEBENTBD BY IMANAGING DIRBCTORJAGADBBESH BALOOR»/O LATE GOPALAKRISHNA SUVARNAAGED ABOUT 56 YRBRARKOTTARA CHOWKLIMANGALORE- 575 OOL|SRI JAGADBESHA BALOOR»/O LATE GOPALAKRISHNA SUVARNAAGED ABOUT 56 YRBRARNO. 3-28/43 ABCO|TRADE CENTRE, KOTTARA CHOWKI|MANGALORE- 575 OO1. ~.. PETITIONERS
(BY SRI.VENUGOPAL M.S. ADVOCATE )_
AND:
THR INCOME TAX DRBPARTMENT
BY ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER|OF INCOME TAX (TDS)CIRCLE PANAJI PUNDALIKA NIWAS|RUA DE QUREM.PANAJI, GOA- 403 OOL1.
~ RESPONDENT.
(BY SRI K.V.ARAVIND, ADVOCATE)
THIS CRL. PETITION FILED UNDER SECTION 482CR.P.C. BY THR ADVOCATRKR FOR THR PEIITIIONEPRAYING THAT THIS HON’BLE COURT MAY BE PLEASEDTO QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS IN C.C.NO.3672/2016)ONTH ERILE|OF.IMEC(IICOURT),MANGALURU, D.K. VIDE DOCUMENT NO.1 BY ALLOWINGTHIS PETITION.
THIS CRL. PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS,|THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:|
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioners has filed amemo seeking leave of the Court to withdraw the|petition. Said memo is placed on record.
Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
SD/-
JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue