Crl.p v. The Income Tax Department
High Court
23 Nov 2020 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Crl.p v. The Income Tax Department
Date of order
23 Nov 2020
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Crl.p v. The Income Tax Department, the High Court (2020) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURUDATED THIS THE 23 DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2020
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. SOMASHEKAR|CRIMINAL PETITION NO.3548/2017
BETWEEN
B.T.Nagaraj Reddy,Bharath Cement Products,|Sy.No.63/1, No.671,Thnimmareddy Industrial Estate,Hosur Main Road,Bommasancdra,Anekal Taluk, Bangalore Rural 560 OO9.
.. PETITIONER
(by Smt.Manasa, Advocate for
Sri. T.Suryanarayana, Advocate)
AND
The Income Tax Department,By it's Assistant Commissioner of |Income-tax,Circie 9(1), No.1/1, Jeevan Sampige,|Mallesnwaram,Bangalore 560 OO3.
—_ RESPONDENT|
(by Sri.K.V.Aravind, Advocate)
This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 4827 ofCr.PC praying to quash the proceedings in CC.No.90/2014.pending on the file of Special Court (Economic Offences),|Bangalore for an offence under Section 276 C.C of I.T. Act)registered against the petitioner.
2
This Criminal Petition coming on for Admission thisday, the court made tne following:
ORDER
Smt. Manasa, learned counsel for the petitioner ispresent before the court physically. She submits that this|petition filed seeking for quashing of the entire criminal|proceedings against the accused in CC.No.19/2014 does|not.SUrvIVefor.considerationas|proceedings.inCC.No.19/2014 is already disposed off acquitting theaccused, petitioner nerein and the criminal prosecution.launched against him is dropped. Hence, she files a memo.seeking dismissal of the petition as withdrawn.
Therefore, in view of the submission made by thelearned counsel for the petitioner, so also keeping in view|the memo filed by the learned counsel, the petition is.dismissed as withdrawn as sougnt for.
nd
Sd/-—
JUDGE|
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.